Manifold embedding in geostatistical inversion: Redefining optimality in subsurface characterization

• Manifold embedding captures geological complexity unseen in Euclidean models. • Non-Euclidean geometries redefine “optimality” in hydrogeological inversion. • Manifold-based inversion broadens the spectrum of plausible subsurface models. Optimality in geostatistical inversion is commonly defined within a Euclidean framework, often oversimplifying complex and nonstationary geological features. Consequently, conventionally derived “optimal” models may fail to adequately represent geological reality. To address this limitation, we incorporate manifold embedding—a non-Euclidean approach designed to capture the true complexity and heterogeneity of geological structures—directly into the geostatistical inversion process. Using both Kalman filtering (KF) and a geostatistical principal component adaptation evolution strategy (GPCA-ES), established but conventional inverse methods, we compare Euclidean and manifold-based frameworks for estimating hydraulic conductivity in a synthetic aquifer. Our results illustrate that while Euclidean-based methods typically yield a single “optimal” solution, manifold embedding provides a broader “spectrum” of geologically reasonable models, each producing similarly accurate hydraulic responses at observation points. These findings challenge the traditional assumption of uniqueness and highlight the importance of adopting geometric perspectives beyond conventional Euclidean metrics. Rather than seeking incremental numerical improvements in inverse algorithms, this study embodies a fundamental conceptual departure, demonstrating that Euclidean geometry represents merely a special case within a broader class of more realistic, structurally informed non-Euclidean frameworks. By replacing the quest for a single best-fit model—defined by conventional metrics such as minimal RMSE—with a structurally faithful spectrum of plausible solutions, we redefine optimality in hydrogeological modelling under realistic data constraints.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hydrology
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133576
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.60

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Manifold embedding in geostatistical inversion: Redefining optimality in subsurface characterization

Eungyu Park
2 citations
Journal of Hydrology
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
1.60
article

Manifold embedding in geostatistical inversion: Redefining optimality in subsurface characterization

Eungyu Park
article en
2 citations

Abstract

• Manifold embedding captures geological complexity unseen in Euclidean models. • Non-Euclidean geometries redefine “optimality” in hydrogeological inversion. • Manifold-based inversion broadens the spectrum of plausible subsurface models. Optimality in geostatistical inversion is commonly defined within a Euclidean framework, often oversimplifying complex and nonstationary geological features. Consequently, conventionally derived “optimal” models may fail to adequately represent geological reality. To address this limitation, we incorporate manifold embedding—a non-Euclidean approach designed to capture the true complexity and heterogeneity of geological structures—directly into the geostatistical inversion process. Using both Kalman filtering (KF) and a geostatistical principal component adaptation evolution strategy (GPCA-ES), established but conventional inverse methods, we compare Euclidean and manifold-based frameworks for estimating hydraulic conductivity in a synthetic aquifer. Our results illustrate that while Euclidean-based methods typically yield a single “optimal” solution, manifold embedding provides a broader “spectrum” of geologically reasonable models, each producing similarly accurate hydraulic responses at observation points. These findings challenge the traditional assumption of uniqueness and highlight the importance of adopting geometric perspectives beyond conventional Euclidean metrics. Rather than seeking incremental numerical improvements in inverse algorithms, this study embodies a fundamental conceptual departure, demonstrating that Euclidean geometry represents merely a special case within a broader class of more realistic, structurally informed non-Euclidean frameworks. By replacing the quest for a single best-fit model—defined by conventional metrics such as minimal RMSE—with a structurally faithful spectrum of plausible solutions, we redefine optimality in hydrogeological modelling under realistic data constraints.

Journal of HydrologyVol. 661
Kyungpook National University (KR)
National Research Foundation of Korea, Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
1.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Manifold embedding in geostatistical inversion: Redefining optimality in subsurface characterization — Eungyu Park · Journal of Hydrology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS