The Fallacy of Sustainability: Evidence From Yangtze River Fishing Ban

ABSTRACT This study examines the impact of a sustainability policy, the 2015 Chinese ban on fishing in the Yangtze River, on economic outcomes. Utilizing Chinese county‐level data and the DID approach, results reveal that the policy has a negative consequence, reducing growth in the agricultural sector by 3% in counties located within prefecture‐level cities adjacent to the Yangtze River. Notably, the largest adverse effects is found in the central Yangtze River Basin, compared to the western and eastern regions. The findings remain robust across a variety of econometric specifications. However, results show that the extended fishing ban does not induce significant job losses or income reductions, suggesting that the policy facilitated a shift from traditional fishing to other sectors, thereby reducing income volatility for workers within the agricultural industry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agribusiness
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.22062
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Fallacy of Sustainability: Evidence From Yangtze River Fishing Ban

Wenbiao Sha, Xiaoyu Zhu, Ashok K. Mishra
1 citations
Agribusiness
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
3.13
article

The Fallacy of Sustainability: Evidence From Yangtze River Fishing Ban

Wenbiao Sha, Xiaoyu Zhu, Ashok K. Mishra
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study examines the impact of a sustainability policy, the 2015 Chinese ban on fishing in the Yangtze River, on economic outcomes. Utilizing Chinese county‐level data and the DID approach, results reveal that the policy has a negative consequence, reducing growth in the agricultural sector by 3% in counties located within prefecture‐level cities adjacent to the Yangtze River. Notably, the largest adverse effects is found in the central Yangtze River Basin, compared to the western and eastern regions. The findings remain robust across a variety of econometric specifications. However, results show that the extended fishing ban does not induce significant job losses or income reductions, suggesting that the policy facilitated a shift from traditional fishing to other sectors, thereby reducing income volatility for workers within the agricultural industry.

Agribusiness
Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Arizona State University (US)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Fallacy of Sustainability: Evidence From Yangtze River Fishing Ban — Wenbiao Sha, Xiaoyu Zhu, et al. · Agribusiness (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS