Evaluation of a centrifuge quick test to determine the water retention parameters of turf rootzone materials

Abstract The common water retention parameters of materials used for rootzones of turfgrass are field capacity, air capacity, wilting point, and available water capacity. More measurement points are necessary to describe the entire water retention curve (WRC) correctly, for example, for model applications. Standard laboratory methods include sand suction tables and pressure plates, or technically more advanced methods using tensiometers and evaporation. All these methods require special equipment and are time‐consuming (at least 1 week); using the centrifuge method as a quick test to determine the whole WRC takes not more than 1 day. We compared water retention parameters and complete WRC of seven different root zone construction materials with various textures and organic matter contents determined by standard and centrifuge methods. Nearly all centrifuge results were within the reproducibility range of the standard method, thus demonstrating the application potential of this quick method.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Turfgrass Society research journal
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/its2.70078
Primary Topic
Soil and Unsaturated Flow
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of a centrifuge quick test to determine the water retention parameters of turf rootzone materials

Hadi Hamaaziz Muhammed, Ruediger Anlauf, Jan Cordel, Wolfgang Praemassing
International Turfgrass Society research journal
Soil and Unsaturated Flow
article

Evaluation of a centrifuge quick test to determine the water retention parameters of turf rootzone materials

Hadi Hamaaziz Muhammed, Ruediger Anlauf, Jan Cordel, Wolfgang Praemassing
article en

Abstract

Abstract The common water retention parameters of materials used for rootzones of turfgrass are field capacity, air capacity, wilting point, and available water capacity. More measurement points are necessary to describe the entire water retention curve (WRC) correctly, for example, for model applications. Standard laboratory methods include sand suction tables and pressure plates, or technically more advanced methods using tensiometers and evaporation. All these methods require special equipment and are time‐consuming (at least 1 week); using the centrifuge method as a quick test to determine the whole WRC takes not more than 1 day. We compared water retention parameters and complete WRC of seven different root zone construction materials with various textures and organic matter contents determined by standard and centrifuge methods. Nearly all centrifuge results were within the reproducibility range of the standard method, thus demonstrating the application potential of this quick method.

International Turfgrass Society research journalVol. 15(1)
Hochschule Osnabrück (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Soil and Unsaturated Flow
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.