Biomechanical comparison of multiple zero-profile systems in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a finite element analysis
The FSZP implant provided superior stability, while ROI-C exhibited a lower risk of implant-related complications. The TSZP implant was more prone to subsidence, which may be mitigated by optimizing stress distribution and enhancing damage prevention. Biomechanical performance was poorer under osteoporotic conditions, highlighting the need for careful surgical planning.
Authors
- Jing-Lai Xue
- Y J Chen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8030-663X)
- Huo-Huo Xue
- Wenjia Sun (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4802-1359)
- Zhili Zeng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6794-7862)
- Xiong-Han Lian
Institutions
- Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN)
- Fujian Medical University (CN)
- Fuzhou Second Hospital (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
- Published
- 2025-05-24
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-05918-6
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 4.01
Funders
- Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province
- Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
- Fujian Medical University