Developing topsoil structure through conservation management to protect subsoil from compaction

The problem of subsoil compaction is increasing because agricultural machinery is becoming heavier and heavier and exerts pressure to the subsoil. Conservation management promotes edaphic soil structure and increases the bearing capacity of the soil. This may even prevent subsoil compaction. To assess the ability of conservation management to mitigate subsoil compaction, we evaluated hydraulic, biological and structural parameters across the soil profile of two agricultural conservation management systems, no-till and shallow minimum tillage in transition to no-till, in comparison to conventional tillage at two sites in Austria. We found that conservation management resulted in higher aggregate and percolation stability compared to conventional management in the tillage horizon down to 30 cm. In undisturbed soils, this structural stability was correlated with organic carbon content. However, mechanical soil disturbance reduced the structural stability, even if the organic carbon in the soil was still elevated. We found no difference in correlation with soil stability parameters between microbial biomass carbon, dissolved and total organic carbon, despite the different processes by which they contribute to the formation of soil aggregates. Below the tillage horizon, subsoil structural stability was not affected by management. However, the different bearing capacity and thus protective effect of the upper soil layers resulted in lower penetration resistance in depths below the tillage depth for both conservation management systems. As the positive effects of shallow tillage are less concentrated on the soil surface than with no-tillage, we recommend shallow minimum tillage if the subsoil is at risk of compaction. • Conservation management increased the load-bearing capacity of agricultural soil. • Subsoil structural stability was not directly affected by soil management. • In undisturbed soils structural stability correlated with organic carbon content. • Soil disturbance reduced structural stability even at elevated soil organic carbon. • High topsoil stability through conservation management prevented subsoil compaction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Soil and Tillage Research
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2025.106669
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Soil Management and Crop Yield
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.93

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developing topsoil structure through conservation management to protect subsoil from compaction

Andreas Klik, Marton Toth, Gernot Bodner, Gunther Liebhard et al.
5 citations
Soil and Tillage Research
Soil Management and Crop Yield
5.93
article

Developing topsoil structure through conservation management to protect subsoil from compaction

Andreas Klik, Marton Toth, Gernot Bodner, Gunther Liebhard, Stefan Strohmeier, Peter Strauß, Christine Stumpp, Xiaoping Zhang
article en
5 citations

Abstract

The problem of subsoil compaction is increasing because agricultural machinery is becoming heavier and heavier and exerts pressure to the subsoil. Conservation management promotes edaphic soil structure and increases the bearing capacity of the soil. This may even prevent subsoil compaction. To assess the ability of conservation management to mitigate subsoil compaction, we evaluated hydraulic, biological and structural parameters across the soil profile of two agricultural conservation management systems, no-till and shallow minimum tillage in transition to no-till, in comparison to conventional tillage at two sites in Austria. We found that conservation management resulted in higher aggregate and percolation stability compared to conventional management in the tillage horizon down to 30 cm. In undisturbed soils, this structural stability was correlated with organic carbon content. However, mechanical soil disturbance reduced the structural stability, even if the organic carbon in the soil was still elevated. We found no difference in correlation with soil stability parameters between microbial biomass carbon, dissolved and total organic carbon, despite the different processes by which they contribute to the formation of soil aggregates. Below the tillage horizon, subsoil structural stability was not affected by management. However, the different bearing capacity and thus protective effect of the upper soil layers resulted in lower penetration resistance in depths below the tillage depth for both conservation management systems. As the positive effects of shallow tillage are less concentrated on the soil surface than with no-tillage, we recommend shallow minimum tillage if the subsoil is at risk of compaction. • Conservation management increased the load-bearing capacity of agricultural soil. • Subsoil structural stability was not directly affected by soil management. • In undisturbed soils structural stability correlated with organic carbon content. • Soil disturbance reduced structural stability even at elevated soil organic carbon. • High topsoil stability through conservation management prevented subsoil compaction.

Soil and Tillage ResearchVol. 253
Konrad Lorenz Institute for Evolution and Cognition Research (AT), Institute for Environmental Management (US), Institute of Soil and Water Conservation (CN), BOKU University (AT)
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Soil Management and Crop Yield
5.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.