Life cycle assessment of hydrogen production pathways to support hydrogen decarbonization policies in a Canadian context

Abstract Hydrogen is a promising energy carrier that is expected to play a crucial role in helping Canada achieve its net-zero target by 2050. However, reducing the ambiguity in regulatory frameworks is essential to incentivize and facilitate international trade in hydrogen. To this end, regulators must agree on quantification methodologies that consider life cycle boundaries, process descriptions, co-product allocation, conversion constants, and certification units. Several studies have highlighted the importance of life cycle assessment (LCA) as a standardized, relevant method for estimating the carbon footprint associated with hydrogen production and evaluating its environmental sustainability. As such, LCA-based certification schemes could help create a transparent hydrogen market. The aim of this study is to validate the proposed harmonized LCA-based methodology for quantifying hydrogen production’s carbon intensity. This methodology follows a consistent scope and life cycle inventory (LCI) development criteria, alongside a rigorous data quality assessment. The well-to-gate carbon intensities of six hydrogen production pathways are compared, which range from 0.26 to 10.07 kg CO 2e per kg of hydrogen (kg CO 2e /kg H 2 ), against the hydrogen carbon intensity thresholds established by the Canadian Clean Hydrogen Investment Tax Credit (CHITC). For example, the biomass gasification with carbon capture (CC) pathway demonstrates the lowest carbon intensity, while thermochemical pathways, such as steam methane reforming of natural gas without CC, poses challenges to meeting the maximum CHTIC threshold of 4 kg CO 2e /kg H 2 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Energy
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-025-1008-2
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Life cycle assessment of hydrogen production pathways to support hydrogen decarbonization policies in a Canadian context

Anton Alvarez‐Majmutov, Miyuru Kannangara, Jalil Shadbahr, Giovanna Gonzales‐Calienes et al.
1 citations
Frontiers in Energy
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
0.80
article

Life cycle assessment of hydrogen production pathways to support hydrogen decarbonization policies in a Canadian context

Anton Alvarez‐Majmutov, Miyuru Kannangara, Jalil Shadbahr, Giovanna Gonzales‐Calienes, Marzouk Benali, Farid Bensebaa, Nima Ghavidel Mehr, Jianjun Yang, Jinwen Chen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Hydrogen is a promising energy carrier that is expected to play a crucial role in helping Canada achieve its net-zero target by 2050. However, reducing the ambiguity in regulatory frameworks is essential to incentivize and facilitate international trade in hydrogen. To this end, regulators must agree on quantification methodologies that consider life cycle boundaries, process descriptions, co-product allocation, conversion constants, and certification units. Several studies have highlighted the importance of life cycle assessment (LCA) as a standardized, relevant method for estimating the carbon footprint associated with hydrogen production and evaluating its environmental sustainability. As such, LCA-based certification schemes could help create a transparent hydrogen market. The aim of this study is to validate the proposed harmonized LCA-based methodology for quantifying hydrogen production’s carbon intensity. This methodology follows a consistent scope and life cycle inventory (LCI) development criteria, alongside a rigorous data quality assessment. The well-to-gate carbon intensities of six hydrogen production pathways are compared, which range from 0.26 to 10.07 kg CO 2e per kg of hydrogen (kg CO 2e /kg H 2 ), against the hydrogen carbon intensity thresholds established by the Canadian Clean Hydrogen Investment Tax Credit (CHITC). For example, the biomass gasification with carbon capture (CC) pathway demonstrates the lowest carbon intensity, while thermochemical pathways, such as steam methane reforming of natural gas without CC, poses challenges to meeting the maximum CHTIC threshold of 4 kg CO 2e /kg H 2 .

Frontiers in EnergyVol. 19(6)
Natural Resources Canada (CA), National Research Council Canada (CA)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
0.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.