Implicit Ethical Consumerism: Development and Cross‐Cultural Validation of a Novel Affect‐Misattribution Measure

ABSTRACT The literature has documented a pervasive attitude‐behavior gap in ethical consumption, whereby many consumers do not consistently translate their expressed positive attitudes toward ethical products into behavior. For marketers investing in social responsibility initiatives, this suggests that more accurate segmentation and demand forecasting may require an implicit measure of ethical consumerism. This study draws from literatures in ethical consumption and the psychology of attitudes to develop and validate such a measurement tool. Across three pretests and three studies, findings show that our implicit measure (based on the Affect Misattribution Procedure [AMP]) is cross‐culturally robust in predicting ethical consumption behavior beyond effects of explicit measures. Overall, this study indicates that academics and practitioners can enhance their predictive capabilities regarding ethical consumption behavior by integrating the AMP‐inspired measure with traditional explicit measures, rather than solely relying on the latter.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychology and Marketing
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.22238
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implicit Ethical Consumerism: Development and Cross‐Cultural Validation of a Novel Affect‐Misattribution Measure

Lamberto Zollo, Brandon Reich, Riccardo Rialti, Hong Yuan
1 citations
Psychology and Marketing
Social and Intergroup Psychology
4.20
article

Implicit Ethical Consumerism: Development and Cross‐Cultural Validation of a Novel Affect‐Misattribution Measure

Lamberto Zollo, Brandon Reich, Riccardo Rialti, Hong Yuan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The literature has documented a pervasive attitude‐behavior gap in ethical consumption, whereby many consumers do not consistently translate their expressed positive attitudes toward ethical products into behavior. For marketers investing in social responsibility initiatives, this suggests that more accurate segmentation and demand forecasting may require an implicit measure of ethical consumerism. This study draws from literatures in ethical consumption and the psychology of attitudes to develop and validate such a measurement tool. Across three pretests and three studies, findings show that our implicit measure (based on the Affect Misattribution Procedure [AMP]) is cross‐culturally robust in predicting ethical consumption behavior beyond effects of explicit measures. Overall, this study indicates that academics and practitioners can enhance their predictive capabilities regarding ethical consumption behavior by integrating the AMP‐inspired measure with traditional explicit measures, rather than solely relying on the latter.

Psychology and MarketingVol. 42(9)
University of Siena (IT), Portland State University (US), University of Milan (IT), Atlantic University College (PR), Florida Atlantic University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.