Moral Values Underpinning COVID-19 Online Communication Patterns

The COVID-19 pandemic has triggered profound societal changes, extending beyond its health impacts to the moralization of behaviors. Leveraging insights from moral psychology, this study delves into the moral fabric shaping online discussions surrounding COVID-19 over a span of nearly two years. Our investigation identifies four distinct user groups characterized by differences in morality, political ideology, and communication styles. We underscore the intricate relationship between moral differences and political ideologies, revealing a nuanced picture where moral orientations do not rigidly separate users politically. Furthermore, we uncover patterns of moral homophily within the social network, highlighting the existence of one potential moral echo chamber. Analyzing the moral themes embedded in messages, we observe that moral diversity and moral plurality resonate more effectively with out-group members. This research contributes valuable insights into the complex interplay between moral foundations, communication dynamics, and network structures on Twitter.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3701716.3717538
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Moral Values Underpinning COVID-19 Online Communication Patterns

Julie Jiang, Emilio Ferrara, Luca Luceri
1 citations
Misinformation and Its Impacts
4.20
article

Moral Values Underpinning COVID-19 Online Communication Patterns

Julie Jiang, Emilio Ferrara, Luca Luceri
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has triggered profound societal changes, extending beyond its health impacts to the moralization of behaviors. Leveraging insights from moral psychology, this study delves into the moral fabric shaping online discussions surrounding COVID-19 over a span of nearly two years. Our investigation identifies four distinct user groups characterized by differences in morality, political ideology, and communication styles. We underscore the intricate relationship between moral differences and political ideologies, revealing a nuanced picture where moral orientations do not rigidly separate users politically. Furthermore, we uncover patterns of moral homophily within the social network, highlighting the existence of one potential moral echo chamber. Analyzing the moral themes embedded in messages, we observe that moral diversity and moral plurality resonate more effectively with out-group members. This research contributes valuable insights into the complex interplay between moral foundations, communication dynamics, and network structures on Twitter.

National Science Foundation, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.