Pitfalls in Artificial Intelligence Powered Discovery Due to Electrocatalyst Evaluation Methodologies

The explosive increase in popularity and increased accessibility to artificial intelligence and data science tools have opened the door for exploring previously deemed “too large” experimental spaces efficiently in experimental chemistry. This is of special interest for the field of electrocatalysis, where the development of new materials has relied largely on trial-and-error approaches that are not time- and resource-efficient. By leveraging these approaches, we can more effectively find promising electrocatalyst compositions and synthesis conditions that result in lower overpotentials and higher electrocatalyst durability. In this Technical Note, we use oxygen evolution electrocatalysts as a model to highlight potential pitfalls in the use of data-driven strategies for electrocatalyst development, focusing on the important choice of optimization metrics, normalization of data, and common errors that may appear during these kinds of approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS electrochemistry.
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acselectrochem.5c00153
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Materials Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.04

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pitfalls in Artificial Intelligence Powered Discovery Due to Electrocatalyst Evaluation Methodologies

Ken Sakaushi, A. Garcia
2 citations
ACS electrochemistry.
Machine Learning in Materials Science
1.04
article

Pitfalls in Artificial Intelligence Powered Discovery Due to Electrocatalyst Evaluation Methodologies

Ken Sakaushi, A. Garcia
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The explosive increase in popularity and increased accessibility to artificial intelligence and data science tools have opened the door for exploring previously deemed “too large” experimental spaces efficiently in experimental chemistry. This is of special interest for the field of electrocatalysis, where the development of new materials has relied largely on trial-and-error approaches that are not time- and resource-efficient. By leveraging these approaches, we can more effectively find promising electrocatalyst compositions and synthesis conditions that result in lower overpotentials and higher electrocatalyst durability. In this Technical Note, we use oxygen evolution electrocatalysts as a model to highlight potential pitfalls in the use of data-driven strategies for electrocatalyst development, focusing on the important choice of optimization metrics, normalization of data, and common errors that may appear during these kinds of approaches.

ACS electrochemistry.Vol. 1(9)
National Institute for Materials Science (JP), University of Cambridge (GB), St. Ann's Episcopal Church (US)
University of Cambridge, Churchill College, University of Cambridge, Japan Science and Technology Agency, National Institute for Materials Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Machine Learning in Materials Science
1.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Pitfalls in Artificial Intelligence Powered Discovery Due to Electrocatalyst Evaluation Methodologies — Ken Sakaushi, A. Garcia · ACS electrochemistry. (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS