Towards effective knowledge co-production and deliberation: developing public engagement competencies among scientists and policymakers

Abstract Governments committed to the Paris Agreement are obligated to empower the public to participate in decision-making on climate change. Research shows that higher levels of public engagement (PE) lead to fairer, more inclusive, and socially acceptable policies and outcomes. Yet significant gaps remain between obligation and implementation due to institutional, structural and social-psychological factors faced by policymakers and scientists. This study developed a situated, longitudinal training programme to support decision makers new to PE overcome these challenges. Incorporating learning-by-doing, critical reflection, and social support the programme enabled 19 of 20 participants to gain new knowledge, understanding, and skills related to knowledge co-production and deliberation. Additionally, 30% demonstrated positive changes in PE attitudes and values, and 40% noted behavioural shifts favourable of PE. Competency development was influenced by factors such as programme enjoyment, opportunities for reflection, and perceived suitability for PE roles. Just as policies require public acceptance, public participation requires decision-makers acceptance. To further the social acceptance of knowledge co-production and deliberation, increased funding and integration of comprehensive, experiential PE training in institutions and programmes. Pre- and post-programme evaluation is also needed to assess learning, barriers, and pathways to ethical knowledge co-production and deliberation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environment Development and Sustainability
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-025-06324-y
Primary Topic
Innovative Education and Learning Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards effective knowledge co-production and deliberation: developing public engagement competencies among scientists and policymakers

Laura Fogg‐Rogers, Sophie Laggan, Ana Margarida Sardo
Environment Development and Sustainability
Innovative Education and Learning Practices
article

Towards effective knowledge co-production and deliberation: developing public engagement competencies among scientists and policymakers

Laura Fogg‐Rogers, Sophie Laggan, Ana Margarida Sardo
article en

Abstract

Abstract Governments committed to the Paris Agreement are obligated to empower the public to participate in decision-making on climate change. Research shows that higher levels of public engagement (PE) lead to fairer, more inclusive, and socially acceptable policies and outcomes. Yet significant gaps remain between obligation and implementation due to institutional, structural and social-psychological factors faced by policymakers and scientists. This study developed a situated, longitudinal training programme to support decision makers new to PE overcome these challenges. Incorporating learning-by-doing, critical reflection, and social support the programme enabled 19 of 20 participants to gain new knowledge, understanding, and skills related to knowledge co-production and deliberation. Additionally, 30% demonstrated positive changes in PE attitudes and values, and 40% noted behavioural shifts favourable of PE. Competency development was influenced by factors such as programme enjoyment, opportunities for reflection, and perceived suitability for PE roles. Just as policies require public acceptance, public participation requires decision-makers acceptance. To further the social acceptance of knowledge co-production and deliberation, increased funding and integration of comprehensive, experiential PE training in institutions and programmes. Pre- and post-programme evaluation is also needed to assess learning, barriers, and pathways to ethical knowledge co-production and deliberation.

Environment Development and Sustainability
University of the West of England (GB), Air Quality Consultants (United Kingdom) (GB)
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Innovative Education and Learning Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.