Perlindungan Konsumen Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Sektor Keuangan (Studi Komparatif LAPS-SJK Dan BPSK)

This article discusses the legal protection provided by 2 (two) consumer dispute resolution institutions, namely the Financial Services Sector Alternative Dispute Resolution Institution (LAPS-SJK) and the Consumer Dispute Resolution Agency (BPSK). This article focuses on a comparison of the legal force of decisions issued by the two institutions. By combining normative legal views and the opinions of practitioners consisting of the Financial Services Authority (in this case represented by OJK Central Java Province) and the Consumer Dispute Resolution Body (in this case represented by BPSK Semarang City), this article can underline the optimization of consumer protection in disputes with business actors in the financial services sector. This article can show the complementary side of BPSK with the presence of LAPS-SJK as an institution that handles disputes in the financial sector. This article aims to present a comparison between LAPS-SJK and BPSK as alternative resolution institutions resulting from a combination of factual events and practitioners' opinions with the analytical knife being the applicable laws and regulations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Law Development and Justice Review
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14710/ldjr.8.2025.52-68
Primary Topic
Financial Analysis and Corporate Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perlindungan Konsumen Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Sektor Keuangan (Studi Komparatif LAPS-SJK Dan BPSK)

Herni Widanarti, Rinitami Njatrijani, Mutiara Pramesti
Law Development and Justice Review
Financial Analysis and Corporate Governance
article

Perlindungan Konsumen Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Sektor Keuangan (Studi Komparatif LAPS-SJK Dan BPSK)

Herni Widanarti, Rinitami Njatrijani, Mutiara Pramesti
article en

Abstract

This article discusses the legal protection provided by 2 (two) consumer dispute resolution institutions, namely the Financial Services Sector Alternative Dispute Resolution Institution (LAPS-SJK) and the Consumer Dispute Resolution Agency (BPSK). This article focuses on a comparison of the legal force of decisions issued by the two institutions. By combining normative legal views and the opinions of practitioners consisting of the Financial Services Authority (in this case represented by OJK Central Java Province) and the Consumer Dispute Resolution Body (in this case represented by BPSK Semarang City), this article can underline the optimization of consumer protection in disputes with business actors in the financial services sector. This article can show the complementary side of BPSK with the presence of LAPS-SJK as an institution that handles disputes in the financial sector. This article aims to present a comparison between LAPS-SJK and BPSK as alternative resolution institutions resulting from a combination of factual events and practitioners' opinions with the analytical knife being the applicable laws and regulations.

Law Development and Justice ReviewVol. 8(1)
Diponegoro University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Financial Analysis and Corporate Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.