Landscape complexity and edge effects shape bird community composition and filter functional traits in villages
• Landscape and local scale factors determine bird functional trait variations. • Landscape complexity and within village site position were key predictors. • Diet, nest location, body mass and nestlings’ diet were influenced. • Landscape complexity and village proximity to cities affected bird predation. • Green spaces of simple landscapes should be diversified. As agricultural intensification and urban sprawl threaten global ecosystems, preserving high-biodiversity habitats, even within settlements, is paramount. Many European villages still retain a traditional structure, which can support biodiversity. However, the surrounding landscape and within-village position could determine bird species composition and functional traits. We examined how bird functional traits (diet, nest location, body mass, nestling diet, foraging technique, migration status), species composition, and predation on dummy caterpillars were affected by landscape-scale variables in 64 villages in Hungary and Romania. Specifically, we studied the effects of landscape complexity around the villages (simple, agriculture-dominated vs. complex, forested-dominated), village proximity to cities (in agglomeration vs. far from cities), and sampling position within villages (centre vs. edge). Our results showed that landscape complexity and within-village position were key determinants of bird functional trait variation. We observed a shift towards carnivorous (also in the case of nestling diet) and more ground nesters at village edges and in complex landscapes. In contrast, larger-bodied bird species preferred villages in simple landscapes. Bird predation was higher in simple landscapes within city agglomerations but this pattern was the opposite far from cities, possibly due to varying food resource availability. These findings underscore the importance of enhancing landscape features in and around villages, particularly in simple landscapes and village centres.
Authors
- Zoltán Benkő (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1032-9769)
- Krisztina Sándor (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4013-7418)
- István Urák (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2130-5068)
- Róbert Gallé (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5516-8623)
- Dávid Korányi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0101-0425)
- Zoltán László (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5064-4785)
- Andràs Báldí (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6063-3721)
- Gábor Seress (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9828-4934)
- Jenő J. Purger (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3302-6544)
- Tamás Lakatos (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4414-8459)
- Péter Batáry (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1017-6996)
- István Kovács
Institutions
- Eötvös Loránd University (HU)
- University of Debrecen (HU)
- University of Pannonia (HU)
- Babeș-Bolyai University (RO)
- Institute of Ecology and Botany (HU)
- Societatea Ornitologică Română (RO)
- Veszprémi Érseki Hittudományi Fõiskola (HU)
- HUN-REN Centre for Ecological Research (HU)
- Kiskunság National Park (HU)
- Sapientia Hungarian University of Transylvania (RO)
- University of Pecs (HU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Ecological Indicators
- Published
- 2025-05-23
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113644
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 6.94
Funders
- Magyar Tudományos Akadémia
- Nemzeti Kutatási Fejlesztési és Innovációs Hivatal
- Nemzeti Kutatási, Fejlesztési és Innovaciós Alap