Communication tools: a genealogy of quantitative easing

For most of the twenty-first century, the world’s largest central banks have been acquiring vast quantities of government debt. From the 1930s–1970s, identical operations formed the financial backbone of deficit-funded public sector expansion. In the latter twentieth-century, monetised deficit-support became anathema to models of central bank independence built on the dominance of monetary authorities over fiscal agencies and an inflation-targeting regime operationalised through interest-rate setting. Massive public debt acquisitions re-commenced in Japan in 2001 and then spread throughout the advanced economies. Those 'quantiative easing' (QE) policies were launched in the shadow of system-wide bank failures and fiscal stimulus programmes funded by historic public deficits. Central banks justified QE using a theoretic nomenclature which emphasised the private-market orientation of their policies and omitted any fiscal-supporting function. This article documents the development of the communication strategies used by two first-mover central banks, the Bank of Japan and the US Federal Reserve, to re-package and explain debt monetisation techniques as market-neutral inflation-targeting exercises. It compares the internal and external communications of those central banks during the launch of QE programmes to produce a genealogy which explains how and why the fiscal-supporting functions of public debt purchases were obscured in favour of private-market effects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Political Economy
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2025.2504399
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Media Studies and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.59

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Communication tools: a genealogy of quantitative easing

Will Bateman
3 citations
New Political Economy
Media Studies and Communication
11.59
article

Communication tools: a genealogy of quantitative easing

Will Bateman
article en
3 citations

Abstract

For most of the twenty-first century, the world’s largest central banks have been acquiring vast quantities of government debt. From the 1930s–1970s, identical operations formed the financial backbone of deficit-funded public sector expansion. In the latter twentieth-century, monetised deficit-support became anathema to models of central bank independence built on the dominance of monetary authorities over fiscal agencies and an inflation-targeting regime operationalised through interest-rate setting. Massive public debt acquisitions re-commenced in Japan in 2001 and then spread throughout the advanced economies. Those 'quantiative easing' (QE) policies were launched in the shadow of system-wide bank failures and fiscal stimulus programmes funded by historic public deficits. Central banks justified QE using a theoretic nomenclature which emphasised the private-market orientation of their policies and omitted any fiscal-supporting function. This article documents the development of the communication strategies used by two first-mover central banks, the Bank of Japan and the US Federal Reserve, to re-package and explain debt monetisation techniques as market-neutral inflation-targeting exercises. It compares the internal and external communications of those central banks during the launch of QE programmes to produce a genealogy which explains how and why the fiscal-supporting functions of public debt purchases were obscured in favour of private-market effects.

New Political EconomyVol. 30(5)
Australian National University (AU)
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Media Studies and Communication
11.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.