The impact of psychological distance on preferences for prenatal screening and diagnosis for chromosomal abnormalities: A hierarchical Bayes analysis of a discrete choice experiment

Our findings showed that although both groups valued safer and more accurate screening strategies, there was a difference in willingness to pay, sensitivity to cost, and predictive power of discrete choice experiment estimates between pregnant and non-pregnant women. This difference can be explained by their psychological distance from the decision. In conclusion, psychological distance impacts decision-making and can be identified as a source of hypothetical bias in measuring prenatal screening and diagnosis preferences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0324370
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Economic and Environmental Valuation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The impact of psychological distance on preferences for prenatal screening and diagnosis for chromosomal abnormalities: A hierarchical Bayes analysis of a discrete choice experiment

Aslam H. Anis, Wei Zhang, Tima Mohammadi
1 citations
PLoS ONE
Economic and Environmental Valuation
3.13
article

The impact of psychological distance on preferences for prenatal screening and diagnosis for chromosomal abnormalities: A hierarchical Bayes analysis of a discrete choice experiment

Aslam H. Anis, Wei Zhang, Tima Mohammadi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Our findings showed that although both groups valued safer and more accurate screening strategies, there was a difference in willingness to pay, sensitivity to cost, and predictive power of discrete choice experiment estimates between pregnant and non-pregnant women. This difference can be explained by their psychological distance from the decision. In conclusion, psychological distance impacts decision-making and can be identified as a source of hypothetical bias in measuring prenatal screening and diagnosis preferences.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(5)
Providence Health Care (CA), University of British Columbia (CA), Centre for Advancing Health Outcomes (CA)
St. Paul's Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Economic and Environmental Valuation
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.