Bovine pain scale: A novel tool for pain assessment in cattle undergoing surgery in the hospital setting

Pain negatively impacts animal welfare and it is still neglected in ruminants. This original study aimed to develop and validate the Bovine Pain Scale (BPS) for acute pain assessment in hospitalized cattle undergoing surgery. This was a blinded, randomized, prospective clinical study. Thirty-six animals were included in the study. The Pain Group (n = 25) included patients admitted to a veterinary teaching hospital requiring any type of soft tissue or orthopedic surgery. Videos were recorded before, 2-6 hours after surgery, 1 hour after the administration of analgesia and 24 hours after surgery. The Control Group (n = 11) included healthy animals that were video recorded twice within a 24-48h interval. The BPS was developed using content validity. A total of 118 videos of 6 minutes were randomized and analyzed by four raters who were unaware of groups, time-points and procedures in two phases with a five-week interval. Statistical analysis was performed using R software. Intra and inter-rater reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient) was very good (0.83-0.94) and ranged from good to very good, respectively (0.65-0.81). The correlation between the BPS and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was strong (rho = 0.77, p < 0.0001) confirming criterion validity. Item-total correlation was acceptable for 3 of 9 items (0.33-0.43) and internal consistency was below the acceptable value (0.6). The scale was responsive to pain but not the administration of analgesia. It was specific for five items, but no items showed sensitivity. The area under the curve of 0.90 demonstrated high discriminatory capacity. According to the receiver operating characteristic curve, the cut-off point for rescue analgesia was ≥ 5 of 18. The BPS is reliable and reproducible, showed content and criterion validity, and may be used in veterinary hospitals for assessing post-operative pain in cattle to guide decision-making towards rescue analgesia. Future studies should refine the instrument to guarantee construct validity and sensitivity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323710
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bovine pain scale: A novel tool for pain assessment in cattle undergoing surgery in the hospital setting

Rubia Mitalli Tomacheuski, Karina Bech Gleerup, Cassandra Klostermann, Sylvain Nichols et al.
1 citations
PLoS ONE
Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
2.35
article

Bovine pain scale: A novel tool for pain assessment in cattle undergoing surgery in the hospital setting

Rubia Mitalli Tomacheuski, Karina Bech Gleerup, Cassandra Klostermann, Sylvain Nichols, Renata Haddad Pinho, Pedro Henrique Esteves Trindade, Marilda Onghero Taffarel, Stélio Pacca Loureiro Luna, Paulo V M Steagall, Beatriz P. Monteiro, André Desrochers, Diane Frank
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Pain negatively impacts animal welfare and it is still neglected in ruminants. This original study aimed to develop and validate the Bovine Pain Scale (BPS) for acute pain assessment in hospitalized cattle undergoing surgery. This was a blinded, randomized, prospective clinical study. Thirty-six animals were included in the study. The Pain Group (n = 25) included patients admitted to a veterinary teaching hospital requiring any type of soft tissue or orthopedic surgery. Videos were recorded before, 2-6 hours after surgery, 1 hour after the administration of analgesia and 24 hours after surgery. The Control Group (n = 11) included healthy animals that were video recorded twice within a 24-48h interval. The BPS was developed using content validity. A total of 118 videos of 6 minutes were randomized and analyzed by four raters who were unaware of groups, time-points and procedures in two phases with a five-week interval. Statistical analysis was performed using R software. Intra and inter-rater reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient) was very good (0.83-0.94) and ranged from good to very good, respectively (0.65-0.81). The correlation between the BPS and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was strong (rho = 0.77, p < 0.0001) confirming criterion validity. Item-total correlation was acceptable for 3 of 9 items (0.33-0.43) and internal consistency was below the acceptable value (0.6). The scale was responsive to pain but not the administration of analgesia. It was specific for five items, but no items showed sensitivity. The area under the curve of 0.90 demonstrated high discriminatory capacity. According to the receiver operating characteristic curve, the cut-off point for rescue analgesia was ≥ 5 of 18. The BPS is reliable and reproducible, showed content and criterion validity, and may be used in veterinary hospitals for assessing post-operative pain in cattle to guide decision-making towards rescue analgesia. Future studies should refine the instrument to guarantee construct validity and sensitivity.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(5)
Universidade Estadual de Maringá (BR), North Carolina State University (US), University of Calgary (CA), City University of Hong Kong (HK), Universidade Paranaense (BR), Social Welfare Department (HK), University College Copenhagen (DK), GTS (Denmark) (DK), Hong Kong Jockey Club (HK), Université de Montréal (CA), Michigan State University (US), Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) (BR)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Reduced inequalities, Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
2.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.