Treating moderate to severe menopausal vasomotor symptoms with fezolinetant: responder analysis of the phase 3b DAYLIGHT study

Objectives: To characterize the efficacy of fezolinetant for the treatment of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms (VMS) associated with menopause using responder analyses of VMS frequency, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of quality of life (QOL), and time to response. Methods: Prespecified analysis of DAYLIGHT (NCT05033886), a phase 3b, randomized, double-blind, 24-week, placebo-controlled study of fezolinetant in women considered unsuitable for hormone therapy. Two approaches for responder analyses: (1) participants with change from baseline in the frequency of moderate to severe VMS of ≥50%, ≥75%, and 100%, and (2) participants who experienced a clinically meaningful within-patient change (not placebo adjusted) compared with baseline in 1, 2, or 3 specified combinations of VMS frequency and PROs: the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Sleep Disturbance Short Form 8b total score, Menopause-Specific QOL total score, and Menopause-Specific QOL Vasomotor domain score. P values were nominal and not controlled for multiplicity. Results: Overall, 453 participants were randomized (placebo n = 226; fezolinetant 45 mg n = 227), and 370 (81.9%) of these completed the study (n = 175; n = 195, respectively). The full analysis set comprised 452 participants (placebo n = 226; fezolinetant 45 mg n = 226). Of these, 387 (85.6%) participants completed the 24-week treatment period. The proportion of participants with ≥50%, ≥75%, and 100% reductions in VMS frequency was higher in the fezolinetant 45 mg group than placebo throughout the treatment period. Week 24 odds ratio (OR) comparisons: ≥50% reduction: fezolinetant 45 mg: 60.6% versus placebo: 46.0%; OR: 1.82; 95% CI: 1.25 to 2.65; P = 0.002; ≥75% reduction: fezolinetant 45 mg: 46.9% versus placebo: 29.6%; OR: 2.10; 95% CI: 1.43 to 3.10; P < 0.001; 100% reduction: fezolinetant 45 mg: 22.1% versus placebo: 10.6%; OR: 2.39; 95% CI: 1.42 to 4.10; P = 0.001. Reductions in VMS frequency and severity were seen as early as week 1. A greater proportion of responders was observed in the fezolinetant 45 mg group versus placebo at week 24 in all responder analyses. ORs were supportive of a beneficial effect for fezolinetant 45 mg versus placebo (OR >1) for all PROs. Conclusions: Analyses of responders in the DAYLIGHT study showed higher, clinically meaningful responder rates and supported the treatment effect of fezolinetant relative to placebo in women unsuitable for hormone therapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Menopause The Journal of The North American Menopause Society
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/gme.0000000000002532
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Treating moderate to severe menopausal vasomotor symptoms with fezolinetant: responder analysis of the phase 3b DAYLIGHT study

Marla Shapiro, Martin Blogg, Karla Martins, Katrin Schaudig et al.
1 citations
Menopause The Journal of The North American Menopause Society
Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
1.29
article

Treating moderate to severe menopausal vasomotor symptoms with fezolinetant: responder analysis of the phase 3b DAYLIGHT study

Marla Shapiro, Martin Blogg, Karla Martins, Katrin Schaudig, Antonia Morga, Angelica Lindén Hirschberg, Céline Bouchard
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Objectives: To characterize the efficacy of fezolinetant for the treatment of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms (VMS) associated with menopause using responder analyses of VMS frequency, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of quality of life (QOL), and time to response. Methods: Prespecified analysis of DAYLIGHT (NCT05033886), a phase 3b, randomized, double-blind, 24-week, placebo-controlled study of fezolinetant in women considered unsuitable for hormone therapy. Two approaches for responder analyses: (1) participants with change from baseline in the frequency of moderate to severe VMS of ≥50%, ≥75%, and 100%, and (2) participants who experienced a clinically meaningful within-patient change (not placebo adjusted) compared with baseline in 1, 2, or 3 specified combinations of VMS frequency and PROs: the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Sleep Disturbance Short Form 8b total score, Menopause-Specific QOL total score, and Menopause-Specific QOL Vasomotor domain score. P values were nominal and not controlled for multiplicity. Results: Overall, 453 participants were randomized (placebo n = 226; fezolinetant 45 mg n = 227), and 370 (81.9%) of these completed the study (n = 175; n = 195, respectively). The full analysis set comprised 452 participants (placebo n = 226; fezolinetant 45 mg n = 226). Of these, 387 (85.6%) participants completed the 24-week treatment period. The proportion of participants with ≥50%, ≥75%, and 100% reductions in VMS frequency was higher in the fezolinetant 45 mg group than placebo throughout the treatment period. Week 24 odds ratio (OR) comparisons: ≥50% reduction: fezolinetant 45 mg: 60.6% versus placebo: 46.0%; OR: 1.82; 95% CI: 1.25 to 2.65; P = 0.002; ≥75% reduction: fezolinetant 45 mg: 46.9% versus placebo: 29.6%; OR: 2.10; 95% CI: 1.43 to 3.10; P < 0.001; 100% reduction: fezolinetant 45 mg: 22.1% versus placebo: 10.6%; OR: 2.39; 95% CI: 1.42 to 4.10; P = 0.001. Reductions in VMS frequency and severity were seen as early as week 1. A greater proportion of responders was observed in the fezolinetant 45 mg group versus placebo at week 24 in all responder analyses. ORs were supportive of a beneficial effect for fezolinetant 45 mg versus placebo (OR >1) for all PROs. Conclusions: Analyses of responders in the DAYLIGHT study showed higher, clinically meaningful responder rates and supported the treatment effect of fezolinetant relative to placebo in women unsuitable for hormone therapy.

Menopause The Journal of The North American Menopause SocietyVol. 32(6)
Karolinska University Hospital (SE), University of Toronto (CA), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Astellas Pharma (United Kingdom) (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
1.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.