Comparative Analysis of the Nutritional and Sensory Profiles of Commercial Processed Meat Products Made from Beef and Plant-Based Protein

<b>Background:</b> Plant-based meat analogs (PBMAs) have attracted attention as alternatives to traditional meat. <b>Methods:</b> In this study, three beef products (BPs; BP-1, BP-2, BP-3) and three PBMA products (PPs; PP-1, PP-2, PP-3) purchased from a Korean market were evaluated for nutritional profile-based nutritional facts, such as proximate composition, total calories, and levels of mineral, cholesterol, sugar, fatty acids, and amino acids, and for sensory characteristics. <b>Results:</b> Cholesterol and vaccenic acid were detected only in the BP samples. The levels of crude lipids, zinc, palmitic acid, stearic acid, oleic acid, saturated fatty acids, monounsaturated fatty acids, threonine, and lysine, and the score for taste and flavor were higher for the BPs than for the PPs (<i>p</i> < 0.05). By contrast, the levels of carbohydrates, calcium, iron, magnesium, sodium, glucose, sucrose, total sugar, isoleucine, phenylalanine, and glutamic acid were higher for the PPs than for the BPs. The levels of protein, potassium, phosphorus, copper, aluminum, valine, leucine, histidine, and arginine did not differ significantly between the BPs and the PPs. Multivariate analysis indicated that palmitic acid influenced the differences in nutritional profiles between the BPs and the PPs. Additionally, discrepancies were observed between the measured and labeled values for total sugar in PP-1 and PP-3. <b>Conclusions:</b> These findings offer valuable insights for the development of processed meat products using beef and PBMAs and may help consumers make informed purchasing decisions through the provision of accurate and reliable nutritional information.