Challenging Conventional Wisdom in New Democracies: Social Diversity, Electoral Rules, and Party System Fragmentation in Chile

This study investigates the determinants of party system fragmentation in new democracies by analyzing the interaction between social diversity and electoral rules in Chile. Drawing on a comprehensive dataset of 5,301 district-level elections conducted between 1989 and 2023, we find that ethnic fractionalization shapes the effective number of vote-winning parties, but its impact is strongly mediated by district magnitude and other institutional mechanisms. While ethnic diversity amplifies fragmentation in permissive systems, significant variation is observed across electoral regimes due to contextual factors such as apparentment coalitions and concurrent elections. These findings challenge the universal applicability of existing theories, which often rely on data from consolidated democracies, by highlighting the importance of local and institutional dynamics. In doing so, this study advances a more nuanced understanding of party system fragmentation in new democracies and identifies promising directions for future research. These include exploring the scaling of local cleavages into national divisions, the strategic overlaps in parallel electoral systems, and the temporal dynamics of institutional adaptation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/elj.2024.0064
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Challenging Conventional Wisdom in New Democracies: Social Diversity, Electoral Rules, and Party System Fragmentation in Chile

Kenneth Bunker
1 citations
Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
8.52
article

Challenging Conventional Wisdom in New Democracies: Social Diversity, Electoral Rules, and Party System Fragmentation in Chile

Kenneth Bunker
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the determinants of party system fragmentation in new democracies by analyzing the interaction between social diversity and electoral rules in Chile. Drawing on a comprehensive dataset of 5,301 district-level elections conducted between 1989 and 2023, we find that ethnic fractionalization shapes the effective number of vote-winning parties, but its impact is strongly mediated by district magnitude and other institutional mechanisms. While ethnic diversity amplifies fragmentation in permissive systems, significant variation is observed across electoral regimes due to contextual factors such as apparentment coalitions and concurrent elections. These findings challenge the universal applicability of existing theories, which often rely on data from consolidated democracies, by highlighting the importance of local and institutional dynamics. In doing so, this study advances a more nuanced understanding of party system fragmentation in new democracies and identifies promising directions for future research. These include exploring the scaling of local cleavages into national divisions, the strategic overlaps in parallel electoral systems, and the temporal dynamics of institutional adaptation.

Election Law Journal Rules Politics and PolicyVol. 25(1)
San Sebastián University (CL)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.