Investigating art experts and appraisers as potential white-collar criminals: Theorizing art fraud convenience

This conceptual paper investigates the role of art experts and appraisers in white-collar crime through the lens of convenience theory. As gatekeepers of authenticity, provenance, and valuation, art appraisers hold significant power in shaping market outcomes. Yet, the opacity of appraisal processes and the asymmetry of knowledge between experts and clients might create opportunities for misconduct. This study explores how deviant behaviour among art professionals can be understood through the interaction of three key dimensions of convenience theory: personal greed, social decay, and learning. Drawing on documented cases of art fraud, including the Knoedler Gallery scandal, the paper illustrates how systemic vulnerabilities, and professional incentives may facilitate ethical transgressions. This research contributes to the broader discourse on white-collar crime by theorizing how structural and situational factors shape decision-making and accountability in the art market.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Economic Criminology
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconc.2025.100167
Primary Topic
Art History and Market Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating art experts and appraisers as potential white-collar criminals: Theorizing art fraud convenience

Petter Gottschalk, Federica De Molli
Journal of Economic Criminology
Art History and Market Analysis
article

Investigating art experts and appraisers as potential white-collar criminals: Theorizing art fraud convenience

Petter Gottschalk, Federica De Molli
article en

Abstract

This conceptual paper investigates the role of art experts and appraisers in white-collar crime through the lens of convenience theory. As gatekeepers of authenticity, provenance, and valuation, art appraisers hold significant power in shaping market outcomes. Yet, the opacity of appraisal processes and the asymmetry of knowledge between experts and clients might create opportunities for misconduct. This study explores how deviant behaviour among art professionals can be understood through the interaction of three key dimensions of convenience theory: personal greed, social decay, and learning. Drawing on documented cases of art fraud, including the Knoedler Gallery scandal, the paper illustrates how systemic vulnerabilities, and professional incentives may facilitate ethical transgressions. This research contributes to the broader discourse on white-collar crime by theorizing how structural and situational factors shape decision-making and accountability in the art market.

Journal of Economic CriminologyVol. 9
BI Norwegian Business School (NO)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Art History and Market Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.