The next frontier in mindreading? Assessing generative artificial intelligence (GAI)'s social-cognitive capabilities using dynamic audiovisual stimuli

The integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) into human social contexts has raised fundamental questions about machines’ capacity to understand and respond to complex emotional and social dynamics. While recent studies have demonstrated GAI’s promising capabilities in processing static emotional content, the frontier of dynamic social cognition – where multiple modalities converge to create naturalistic social scenarios – remained largely unexplored. This study advances our understanding by examining the social-cognitive capabilities of Google’s Gemini 1.5 Pro model through its performance on the Movie for the Assessment of Social Cognition (MASC), a sophisticated instrument designed to evaluate mentalization abilities using dynamic audiovisual stimuli. We compared the model’s performance to a human normative sample (N = 1,230) across varying temperature settings (a parameter controlling the level of randomness in the AI's output, where lower values lead to more deterministic responses and higher values increase variability; set at 0, 0.5, and 1). Results revealed that Gemini 1.5 Pro consistently performed above chance across all conditions (all corrected p s < .001, Cohen's h range = 1.17-1.41) and significantly outperformed the human sample mean ( Z = 2.24, p = .025; Glass's Δ = 0.92, 95% CI [0.11, 1.72]; Hedges' g = 0.92, 95% CI [0.12, 1.72]). Analysis of error patterns revealed a distribution between hyper-mentalizing (41.0%; over-attribution of mental states), hypo-mentalizing (46.2%; under-attribution of mental states), and non-mentalizing (12.8%; failure to recognize mental states) errors. These findings extend our understanding of artificial social cognition to complex multimodal processing while raising important questions about the nature of machine-based social understanding. The implications span theoretical considerations in artificial Theory of Mind to practical applications in mental health care and social skills training, though careful consideration is warranted regarding the fundamental differences between human and artificial social cognitive processing. • Generative artificial intelligence (GAI) surpasses human average performance in standardized mindreading assessment • Dynamic audiovisual stimuli reveal GAI's sophisticated social-cognitive processing capabilities • Our findings establish new pathways for GAI applications in mental health assessment and intervention

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers in Human Behavior Reports
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100702
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Action Observation and Synchronization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The next frontier in mindreading? Assessing generative artificial intelligence (GAI)'s social-cognitive capabilities using dynamic audiovisual stimuli

Gunther Meinlschmidt, Zohar Elyoseph, Elad Refoua, Renata Wacker et al.
6 citations
Computers in Human Behavior Reports
Action Observation and Synchronization
14.63
article

The next frontier in mindreading? Assessing generative artificial intelligence (GAI)'s social-cognitive capabilities using dynamic audiovisual stimuli

Gunther Meinlschmidt, Zohar Elyoseph, Elad Refoua, Renata Wacker, Isabel Dziobek, Iftach Tsafrir
article en
6 citations

Abstract

The integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) into human social contexts has raised fundamental questions about machines’ capacity to understand and respond to complex emotional and social dynamics. While recent studies have demonstrated GAI’s promising capabilities in processing static emotional content, the frontier of dynamic social cognition – where multiple modalities converge to create naturalistic social scenarios – remained largely unexplored. This study advances our understanding by examining the social-cognitive capabilities of Google’s Gemini 1.5 Pro model through its performance on the Movie for the Assessment of Social Cognition (MASC), a sophisticated instrument designed to evaluate mentalization abilities using dynamic audiovisual stimuli. We compared the model’s performance to a human normative sample (N = 1,230) across varying temperature settings (a parameter controlling the level of randomness in the AI's output, where lower values lead to more deterministic responses and higher values increase variability; set at 0, 0.5, and 1). Results revealed that Gemini 1.5 Pro consistently performed above chance across all conditions (all corrected p s < .001, Cohen's h range = 1.17-1.41) and significantly outperformed the human sample mean ( Z = 2.24, p = .025; Glass's Δ = 0.92, 95% CI [0.11, 1.72]; Hedges' g = 0.92, 95% CI [0.12, 1.72]). Analysis of error patterns revealed a distribution between hyper-mentalizing (41.0%; over-attribution of mental states), hypo-mentalizing (46.2%; under-attribution of mental states), and non-mentalizing (12.8%; failure to recognize mental states) errors. These findings extend our understanding of artificial social cognition to complex multimodal processing while raising important questions about the nature of machine-based social understanding. The implications span theoretical considerations in artificial Theory of Mind to practical applications in mental health care and social skills training, though careful consideration is warranted regarding the fundamental differences between human and artificial social cognitive processing. • Generative artificial intelligence (GAI) surpasses human average performance in standardized mindreading assessment • Dynamic audiovisual stimuli reveal GAI's sophisticated social-cognitive processing capabilities • Our findings establish new pathways for GAI applications in mental health assessment and intervention

Computers in Human Behavior ReportsVol. 19
Bar-Ilan University (IL), University of Basel (CH), University Hospital of Basel (CH), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), IS practice (BE), Imperial College London (GB), Universität Trier (DE), University of Haifa (IL)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Action Observation and Synchronization
14.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.