Sentiment Analysis of Digital Banking Reviews Using Machine Learning and Large Language Models

Sentiment analysis, in the context of digital banking reviews, aims to assess customer satisfaction and support service enhancement. Despite increasing attention to sentiment analysis across domains, Arabic banking reviews remain underexplored. To bridge this gap, we introduce a dataset of 4922 Arabic reviews from three major Saudi digital banks with three sentiment categories positive, negative, or conflict—providing actionable insights for banks. We evaluate the dataset using several machine learning models and four large language models (LLMs)—GPT 3.5, GPT 4, Llama-3-8B-Instruct, and SILMA—using zero-shot (no labeled examples) and few-shot (a few labeled examples) learning strategies. Our results show that GPT 4 performs best among LLMs in few-shot settings, while traditional models still outperform LLMs, with a Voting Classifier achieving 90.24% accuracy. This study contributes a domain-specific dataset and comparative analysis to support research and practical improvements in Arabic digital banking services.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Electronics
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14112125
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.92

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sentiment Analysis of Digital Banking Reviews Using Machine Learning and Large Language Models

Abdulrahman Aloraini, Raghad Alawaji
4 citations
Electronics
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
9.92
article

Sentiment Analysis of Digital Banking Reviews Using Machine Learning and Large Language Models

Abdulrahman Aloraini, Raghad Alawaji
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Sentiment analysis, in the context of digital banking reviews, aims to assess customer satisfaction and support service enhancement. Despite increasing attention to sentiment analysis across domains, Arabic banking reviews remain underexplored. To bridge this gap, we introduce a dataset of 4922 Arabic reviews from three major Saudi digital banks with three sentiment categories positive, negative, or conflict—providing actionable insights for banks. We evaluate the dataset using several machine learning models and four large language models (LLMs)—GPT 3.5, GPT 4, Llama-3-8B-Instruct, and SILMA—using zero-shot (no labeled examples) and few-shot (a few labeled examples) learning strategies. Our results show that GPT 4 performs best among LLMs in few-shot settings, while traditional models still outperform LLMs, with a Voting Classifier achieving 90.24% accuracy. This study contributes a domain-specific dataset and comparative analysis to support research and practical improvements in Arabic digital banking services.

ElectronicsVol. 14(11)
Qassim University (SA), Buraydah Colleges (SA)
Qassim University
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
9.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.