A comparison of vibration behavior of linear and nonlinear bus driver seat suspension system using the 5DOF model

Vibration of the driver's seat suspension is analyzed using a 5DOF model. The seat's suspension system includes an air spring and hydraulic damper having nonlinear behavior determined experimentally. The random excitation y r (t) is simulated with ISO 8608 standard through the floor vibration acceleration obtained with the device VM31. Operating parameters include vibration isolation ability SEAT (%), comfort level a w (m/s 2 ) (ISO 2631:1-1997), and vibration's effect on health A(8) (2002/44/EC). At an average speed of 48 (km/h), the a w values of body parts in the linear case are larger than in the nonlinear case, precisely 32%, 40%, 33,5%, and 35,5% in the head, pelvis, upper torso, and lower torso, respectively. SEAT value reaches 93,5% and 74,1% for the linear and nonlinear cases, respectively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
FME Transaction
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5937/fme2502196p
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.91

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparison of vibration behavior of linear and nonlinear bus driver seat suspension system using the 5DOF model

Ngoc Pham
2 citations
FME Transaction
Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids
1.91
article

A comparison of vibration behavior of linear and nonlinear bus driver seat suspension system using the 5DOF model

Ngoc Pham
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Vibration of the driver's seat suspension is analyzed using a 5DOF model. The seat's suspension system includes an air spring and hydraulic damper having nonlinear behavior determined experimentally. The random excitation y r (t) is simulated with ISO 8608 standard through the floor vibration acceleration obtained with the device VM31. Operating parameters include vibration isolation ability SEAT (%), comfort level a w (m/s 2 ) (ISO 2631:1-1997), and vibration's effect on health A(8) (2002/44/EC). At an average speed of 48 (km/h), the a w values of body parts in the linear case are larger than in the nonlinear case, precisely 32%, 40%, 33,5%, and 35,5% in the head, pelvis, upper torso, and lower torso, respectively. SEAT value reaches 93,5% and 74,1% for the linear and nonlinear cases, respectively.

FME TransactionVol. 53(2)
Ho Chi Minh City University of Transport (VN), Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology (VN)
Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology and Education, Viet Nam National University Ho Chi Minh City
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids
1.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A comparison of vibration behavior of linear and nonlinear bus driver seat suspension system using the 5DOF model — Ngoc Pham · FME Transaction (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS