Radiographic Evaluation in Alveolar Preservation Using Platelet-Rich Fibrin: A Randomized Controlled Trial

<b>Background</b>: Tooth extractions commonly result in dimensional changes of the alveolar ridge. Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) has emerged as a promising autologous biomaterial for alveolar preservation. This randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate, through cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), the effect of PRF in maintaining alveolar dimensions post-extraction. <b>Methods</b>: A single-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted in 10 systemically healthy patients requiring premolar extractions for orthodontic reasons. A total of 36 alveoli were analyzed: 19 with PRF (experimental group) and 17 without PRF (control group). CBCT scans were performed at baseline, 30 days, and 120 days post-extraction to measure alveolar height, vestibulo-palatal/lingual depth at 1, 3, and 5 mm, and bone tissue density using Hounsfield Units (HU). <b>Results</b>: Baseline cephalocaudal alveolar height was similar in both groups (~10.5 mm, <i>p</i> = 0.399). At 30 days, height preservation was significantly greater in the PRF group (10.61 mm vs. 8.82 mm, <i>p</i> < 0.001). At 120 days, the PRF group maintained greater height (10.30 mm vs. 9.31 mm), although this difference was not statistically significant (<i>p</i> = 0.059). No significant differences were observed in alveolar depth at 1, 3, or 5 mm (<i>p</i> > 0.05). The PRF group showed a trend toward better preservation and higher mean bone density values (190-282 HU), although no formal statistical comparison of HU values was performed. Repeated measures ANOVA revealed a significant interaction effect of time and group on alveolar height (<i>p</i> = 0.010, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.046) and at 1 mm depth (<i>p</i> = 0.035, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.020). <b>Conclusions</b>: PRF significantly improved short-term alveolar height preservation. Trends toward better depth preservation and higher bone density values were observed in the PRF group, although these findings were not statistically significant. PRF appears to be a safe biomaterial with potential to support alveolar ridge maintenance post-extraction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dentistry Journal
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13060231
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.84

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Radiographic Evaluation in Alveolar Preservation Using Platelet-Rich Fibrin: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Renata Avecillas-Rodas, J Castillo, Magdalena Molina-Barahona, Denia Morales Navarro et al.
1 citations
Dentistry Journal
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
1.84
article

Radiographic Evaluation in Alveolar Preservation Using Platelet-Rich Fibrin: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Renata Avecillas-Rodas, J Castillo, Magdalena Molina-Barahona, Denia Morales Navarro, Esteban Freire-Meza, Ana Cristina Vásquez-Palacios
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Tooth extractions commonly result in dimensional changes of the alveolar ridge. Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) has emerged as a promising autologous biomaterial for alveolar preservation. This randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate, through cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), the effect of PRF in maintaining alveolar dimensions post-extraction. <b>Methods</b>: A single-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted in 10 systemically healthy patients requiring premolar extractions for orthodontic reasons. A total of 36 alveoli were analyzed: 19 with PRF (experimental group) and 17 without PRF (control group). CBCT scans were performed at baseline, 30 days, and 120 days post-extraction to measure alveolar height, vestibulo-palatal/lingual depth at 1, 3, and 5 mm, and bone tissue density using Hounsfield Units (HU). <b>Results</b>: Baseline cephalocaudal alveolar height was similar in both groups (~10.5 mm, <i>p</i> = 0.399). At 30 days, height preservation was significantly greater in the PRF group (10.61 mm vs. 8.82 mm, <i>p</i> < 0.001). At 120 days, the PRF group maintained greater height (10.30 mm vs. 9.31 mm), although this difference was not statistically significant (<i>p</i> = 0.059). No significant differences were observed in alveolar depth at 1, 3, or 5 mm (<i>p</i> > 0.05). The PRF group showed a trend toward better preservation and higher mean bone density values (190-282 HU), although no formal statistical comparison of HU values was performed. Repeated measures ANOVA revealed a significant interaction effect of time and group on alveolar height (<i>p</i> = 0.010, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.046) and at 1 mm depth (<i>p</i> = 0.035, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.020). <b>Conclusions</b>: PRF significantly improved short-term alveolar height preservation. Trends toward better depth preservation and higher bone density values were observed in the PRF group, although these findings were not statistically significant. PRF appears to be a safe biomaterial with potential to support alveolar ridge maintenance post-extraction.

Dentistry JournalVol. 13(6)
Universidad Católica de Cuenca (EC), Universidad de Ciencias Médicas de la Habana (CU)
Universidad Católica de Cuenca, Universidad de Cuenca
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
1.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.