Towards Optimal Wing Design for Novel Airframe and Propulsion Opportunities
Strict sustainability objectives have been established for the upcoming generation of aircraft. A promising innovative airframe concept is the ultra-high-aspect-ratio Strut-Braced-Wing Aircraft (SBWA). Hydrogen-powered concepts are strong candidates for sustainable propulsion. The study investigates the influence of Liquid Hydrogen (LH2) propulsion on the optimal wing geometry of medium-range SBWA for minimum-cost and minimum-emission objectives. Multiobjective optimizations are performed in two optimization frameworks of differing fidelity for both kerosene- and LH2-propelled SBWA concepts. Furthermore, a range of Pareto-optimal designs show the changes in the optimized planform for variable weighting of the two objectives. The results show that the differences in the optimal wing geometry between the kerosene- and LH2-powered results for each respective objective function are small. For both aircraft, the minimum-emission objective optimizes for lower fuel burns and hence lower emissions, albeit at an increase in wing structural mass. The minimum-cost objective balances the reductions in structural and fuel masses, resulting in a lighter design at lower aspect ratios. Other wing-shape parameters only have minor contributions. Although the wing aspect ratios for both objectives differ by ca. 50%, the actual changes are only 2.5% in fuel and 1.5% in Direct Operating Cost (DOC). Due to a larger set of design variables used in the higher-fidelity optimizations, further parasite and wave drag reduction opportunities result in increased optimal aspect ratios.
Authors
- Ali Elham (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6942-7529)
- Nicolas F. M. Wahler (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6245-6052)
Institutions
- University of Southampton (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Aerospace
- Published
- 2025-05-23
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace12060459
- Primary Topic
- Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Natural Environment Research Council