An Inclusive Method for Connecting System-of-Systems Architectures with Stakeholders

This study addresses the need for early design processes for diverse stakeholder interests in engineering challenges. It does this by using System-of-Systems frameworks, methods, and tools. The presented method, Inclusive SoS Analysis, helps to acquire an overview of the stakeholders’ interests and their preferred System-of-Systems architecture design in an operational setting, and in what way they have conflicting or synergistic interests. The stakeholders are classified by their relationship to the operational execution and integrated broadly throughout the modeling, simulation, and analysis of the System-of-Systems operation—a novel aspect of this work. The proposed method involves three phases: (1) Use case and stakeholder analysis to identify stakeholder interests and define Key Performance Indicators, (2) Modeling and simulation in an agent-based environment to represent System-of-Systems architectures and operational dynamics, and (3) Results and analysis to generate value functions to evaluate the impact of architectural configurations on stakeholder interests. Simulations explore varying System-of-Systems architectures characterized by the constituent systems that compose them, how their collaborative strategy is configured, and how decision making is controlled, revealing the ways in which these factors influence outcomes of the operation. The method is applied to the case study of a complex wildfire fighting scenario with a broad set of stakeholders and multiple constituent systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Systems
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13060406
Primary Topic
Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Inclusive Method for Connecting System-of-Systems Architectures with Stakeholders

Ludvig Knöös Franzén, Rosanna Zimdahl
Systems
Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications
article

An Inclusive Method for Connecting System-of-Systems Architectures with Stakeholders

Ludvig Knöös Franzén, Rosanna Zimdahl
article en

Abstract

This study addresses the need for early design processes for diverse stakeholder interests in engineering challenges. It does this by using System-of-Systems frameworks, methods, and tools. The presented method, Inclusive SoS Analysis, helps to acquire an overview of the stakeholders’ interests and their preferred System-of-Systems architecture design in an operational setting, and in what way they have conflicting or synergistic interests. The stakeholders are classified by their relationship to the operational execution and integrated broadly throughout the modeling, simulation, and analysis of the System-of-Systems operation—a novel aspect of this work. The proposed method involves three phases: (1) Use case and stakeholder analysis to identify stakeholder interests and define Key Performance Indicators, (2) Modeling and simulation in an agent-based environment to represent System-of-Systems architectures and operational dynamics, and (3) Results and analysis to generate value functions to evaluate the impact of architectural configurations on stakeholder interests. Simulations explore varying System-of-Systems architectures characterized by the constituent systems that compose them, how their collaborative strategy is configured, and how decision making is controlled, revealing the ways in which these factors influence outcomes of the operation. The method is applied to the case study of a complex wildfire fighting scenario with a broad set of stakeholders and multiple constituent systems.

SystemsVol. 13(6)
Linköping University (SE)
European Commission, Linköpings Universitet
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.