Tracking students’ progression in developing understanding of energy using AI technologies

[This paper is part of the Focused Collection in Artificial Intelligence Tools in Physics Teaching and Physics Education Research.] Students struggle to acquire the needed energy understanding to meaningfully participate in the energy discourse about socially relevant topics, such as energy transformation or climate change. Identifying students on differing learning trajectories, as well as differences in knowledge used, is essential to help students achieve the needed energy understanding. Collecting and analyzing the longitudinal and fine-grained data necessary for this represents a substantial challenge. However, the use of a digital workbook, which captures all interaction data, has enabled us to collect such data from <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:mrow><a:mi>N</a:mi><a:mo>=</a:mo><a:mn>548</a:mn></a:mrow></a:math> students (data from 172 students were analyzed after applying exclusion criteria). Using machine learning and natural language processing, we analyzed the data to identify productive and unproductive learning trajectories and their underlying reasons. The learning trajectories were classified according to the post-test score. To analyze the tasks from the digital workbook, machine learning methods, specifically random forest, and natural language processing, were employed to identify how students on different learning trajectories progress through the unit. The random forest analysis was accurate in distinguishing between productive and unproductive learning trajectories. Furthermore, natural language processing was employed to analyze open-ended responses, which revealed disparities in the knowledge elements that students on productive and unproductive trajectories utilized. The findings of this study indicate that machine learning techniques have the potential to provide valuable insights into student learning trajectories, which can inform the design of instructional units and the feedback provided to teachers and students.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical Review Physics Education Research
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevphyseducres.21.010152
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Science Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.85

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tracking students’ progression in developing understanding of energy using AI technologies

Hendrik Drachsler, Marcus Kubsch, Knut Neumann, Tobias Wyrwich
2 citations
Physical Review Physics Education Research
Science Education and Pedagogy
17.85
article

Tracking students’ progression in developing understanding of energy using AI technologies

Hendrik Drachsler, Marcus Kubsch, Knut Neumann, Tobias Wyrwich
article en
2 citations

Abstract

[This paper is part of the Focused Collection in Artificial Intelligence Tools in Physics Teaching and Physics Education Research.] Students struggle to acquire the needed energy understanding to meaningfully participate in the energy discourse about socially relevant topics, such as energy transformation or climate change. Identifying students on differing learning trajectories, as well as differences in knowledge used, is essential to help students achieve the needed energy understanding. Collecting and analyzing the longitudinal and fine-grained data necessary for this represents a substantial challenge. However, the use of a digital workbook, which captures all interaction data, has enabled us to collect such data from <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:mrow><a:mi>N</a:mi><a:mo>=</a:mo><a:mn>548</a:mn></a:mrow></a:math> students (data from 172 students were analyzed after applying exclusion criteria). Using machine learning and natural language processing, we analyzed the data to identify productive and unproductive learning trajectories and their underlying reasons. The learning trajectories were classified according to the post-test score. To analyze the tasks from the digital workbook, machine learning methods, specifically random forest, and natural language processing, were employed to identify how students on different learning trajectories progress through the unit. The random forest analysis was accurate in distinguishing between productive and unproductive learning trajectories. Furthermore, natural language processing was employed to analyze open-ended responses, which revealed disparities in the knowledge elements that students on productive and unproductive trajectories utilized. The findings of this study indicate that machine learning techniques have the potential to provide valuable insights into student learning trajectories, which can inform the design of instructional units and the feedback provided to teachers and students.

Physical Review Physics Education ResearchVol. 21(1)
Leibniz Institute for Psychology (DE), Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education (DE), DIPF | Leibniz Institute for Research and Information in Education (DE), Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
Leibniz-Gemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Science Education and Pedagogy
17.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.