Absenteeism in Citizen Participation: Challenges for Local Development Management

This study aims to analyze absenteeism in citizen participation in the district of Anco Huallo (Chincheros – Peru), identifying its causes and evaluating its impact on local development management. Using interviews with key actors such as mayors and former authorities, as well as the review of official documents. The results reveal that State-driven participation mechanisms and decentralization were not consolidated as effective management tools. Instead of promoting a participatory process, they generated distrust and disappointment among social actors, who perceived the Participatory Budget as a mere clientelistic exercise with no real impact. In addition, the creation of Population Centers managed by mayors excluded social organizations and local leaders, intensifying mistrust and reducing citizen participation. The research highlights the need for a more inclusive and locally tailored approach to improve the decentralization process.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Revista Direito Estado e Sociedade
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17808/des.2102
Primary Topic
Community Development and Social Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Absenteeism in Citizen Participation: Challenges for Local Development Management

Paulo Banda Sulca
Revista Direito Estado e Sociedade
Community Development and Social Impact
article

Absenteeism in Citizen Participation: Challenges for Local Development Management

Paulo Banda Sulca
article en

Abstract

This study aims to analyze absenteeism in citizen participation in the district of Anco Huallo (Chincheros – Peru), identifying its causes and evaluating its impact on local development management. Using interviews with key actors such as mayors and former authorities, as well as the review of official documents. The results reveal that State-driven participation mechanisms and decentralization were not consolidated as effective management tools. Instead of promoting a participatory process, they generated distrust and disappointment among social actors, who perceived the Participatory Budget as a mere clientelistic exercise with no real impact. In addition, the creation of Population Centers managed by mayors excluded social organizations and local leaders, intensifying mistrust and reducing citizen participation. The research highlights the need for a more inclusive and locally tailored approach to improve the decentralization process.

Revista Direito Estado e Sociedade(65)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Community Development and Social Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.