Perceptions, Attitudes, and Concerns on Artificial Intelligence Applications in Patients with Cancer

IntroductionThe use of artificial intelligence (AI) in oncology has increased rapidly, transforming various healthcare areas such as pathology, radiology, diagnostics, prognosis, genomics, treatment planning, and clinical trials. However, perspectives, comfort levels, and concerns about AI in cancer care remain largely unexplored.Materials and MethodsThis prospective, descriptive cross-sectional survey study was conducted between May 20, 2024 and October 22, 2024, among 363 patients with cancer from two different hospitals affiliated with Ankara University, a tertiary care center in Türkiye. The survey included three distinct sections: (1) Perceptions: Patients' general views on AI's impact in oncology; (2) Attitudes: Comfort level with AI performing medical tasks; (3) Concerns: Specific fears related to AI implementation (eg, diagnostic errors, data privacy, healthcare costs). Survey responses were summarized descriptively, and differences by age, gender, and education were analyzed using chi-square tests.ResultsA majority (50.7%) believed AI would somewhat (32%) or significantly (18.7%) improve healthcare. However, one-third of patients (33.1%) were very uncomfortable with AI diagnosing cancer, with higher discomfort among less-educated participants (<i>P</i> < .005). Top patient concerns included AI making incorrect diagnoses (31.1%), increasing healthcare costs (27.5%), and not keeping data private (19.6%). Patients with higher education levels expressed less discomfort and fewer concerns.ConclusionsPatients' perceptions and attitudes on AI varied significantly based on education, highlighting the need for targeted educational initiatives. While AI holds potential to revolutionize cancer care, addressing concerns about accuracy, security, and transparency is critical to enhance its acceptance and effectiveness in clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Control
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10732748251343245
Citations
14
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.16
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perceptions, Attitudes, and Concerns on Artificial Intelligence Applications in Patients with Cancer

Enes Erul, Yüksel Ürün, Emre Yekedüz, Yusuf Aktekin et al.
14 citations
Cancer Control
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
9.16
article

Perceptions, Attitudes, and Concerns on Artificial Intelligence Applications in Patients with Cancer

Enes Erul, Yüksel Ürün, Emre Yekedüz, Yusuf Aktekin, Furkan Berk Danışman, Şükrü Armanç Gümüştaş, Büşra Saraç Aktekin
article en
14 citations

Abstract

IntroductionThe use of artificial intelligence (AI) in oncology has increased rapidly, transforming various healthcare areas such as pathology, radiology, diagnostics, prognosis, genomics, treatment planning, and clinical trials. However, perspectives, comfort levels, and concerns about AI in cancer care remain largely unexplored.Materials and MethodsThis prospective, descriptive cross-sectional survey study was conducted between May 20, 2024 and October 22, 2024, among 363 patients with cancer from two different hospitals affiliated with Ankara University, a tertiary care center in Türkiye. The survey included three distinct sections: (1) Perceptions: Patients' general views on AI's impact in oncology; (2) Attitudes: Comfort level with AI performing medical tasks; (3) Concerns: Specific fears related to AI implementation (eg, diagnostic errors, data privacy, healthcare costs). Survey responses were summarized descriptively, and differences by age, gender, and education were analyzed using chi-square tests.ResultsA majority (50.7%) believed AI would somewhat (32%) or significantly (18.7%) improve healthcare. However, one-third of patients (33.1%) were very uncomfortable with AI diagnosing cancer, with higher discomfort among less-educated participants (<i>P</i> < .005). Top patient concerns included AI making incorrect diagnoses (31.1%), increasing healthcare costs (27.5%), and not keeping data private (19.6%). Patients with higher education levels expressed less discomfort and fewer concerns.ConclusionsPatients' perceptions and attitudes on AI varied significantly based on education, highlighting the need for targeted educational initiatives. While AI holds potential to revolutionize cancer care, addressing concerns about accuracy, security, and transparency is critical to enhance its acceptance and effectiveness in clinical practice.

Cancer ControlVol. 32
Ankara University (TR), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US), Bank of Canada (CA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
9.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.