Posterior Nasal Neurectomy for Eosinophilic Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Allergic Rhinitis: Efficacy Study

ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate the efficacy of posterior nasal neurectomy (PNN) in patients with eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis (eCRS) and moderate to severe persistent allergic rhinitis (AR). Methods A total of 42 patients with eCRS and AR were recruited from the Otorhinolaryngology Department of Qingdao University Affiliated Hospital between December 1, 2022, and January 1, 2024. All patients underwent functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS), with 20 receiving additional PNN (intervention group) and 22 undergoing FESS alone (control group). Subjective symptoms were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS), sino‐nasal outcome test‐22 (SNOT‐22), and rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life questionnaire (RQLQ). Objective assessments included the modified Lund‐Kennedy endoscopic score and Lund‐Mackay CT score. Postoperative nasal secretions were collected for cytokine analysis using enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Results Preoperatively, the intervention group exhibited higher rates of excessive sneezing and emotional impact on RQLQ scores ( p < 0.05). At 6‐month follow‐up, the intervention group showed significantly reduced subjective symptom scores (SNOT‐22, p = 0.003; RQLQ activity, p < 0.001; nasal symptoms, p = 0.003; eye symptoms, p = 0.002; total RQLQ score, p = 0.007) and improved objective symptoms (Lund‐Kennedy score, p < 0.001) compared to the control group. Greater reductions (Δ) were observed in eye symptoms ( p = 0.002), emotional ( p = 0.002), and Modified Lund‐Kennedy score ( p < 0.001). Postoperative IL‐5 concentrations were lower in the intervention group ( p = 0.023). Conclusions Concurrent PNN with FESS is both safe and effective, leading to significant improvements in both subjective and objective symptoms in eCRS patients with AR. Cytokine analysis further supports the therapeutic benefits of this combined approach. Level of Evidence 3.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Laryngoscope
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.32294
Primary Topic
Sinusitis and nasal conditions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Posterior Nasal Neurectomy for Eosinophilic Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Allergic Rhinitis: Efficacy Study

Xin Cui, Xudong Yan, Hao Zhao, Longgang Yu et al.
2 links
The Laryngoscope
Sinusitis and nasal conditions
article

Posterior Nasal Neurectomy for Eosinophilic Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Allergic Rhinitis: Efficacy Study

Xin Cui, Xudong Yan, Hao Zhao, Longgang Yu, Xueyan Zhang, Yan Jiang, Shengnan Zhang, Lin Han, Jisheng Zhang, Lin Wang, Zhaoxia Wei, Shunke Li
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate the efficacy of posterior nasal neurectomy (PNN) in patients with eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis (eCRS) and moderate to severe persistent allergic rhinitis (AR). Methods A total of 42 patients with eCRS and AR were recruited from the Otorhinolaryngology Department of Qingdao University Affiliated Hospital between December 1, 2022, and January 1, 2024. All patients underwent functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS), with 20 receiving additional PNN (intervention group) and 22 undergoing FESS alone (control group). Subjective symptoms were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS), sino‐nasal outcome test‐22 (SNOT‐22), and rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life questionnaire (RQLQ). Objective assessments included the modified Lund‐Kennedy endoscopic score and Lund‐Mackay CT score. Postoperative nasal secretions were collected for cytokine analysis using enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Results Preoperatively, the intervention group exhibited higher rates of excessive sneezing and emotional impact on RQLQ scores ( p < 0.05). At 6‐month follow‐up, the intervention group showed significantly reduced subjective symptom scores (SNOT‐22, p = 0.003; RQLQ activity, p < 0.001; nasal symptoms, p = 0.003; eye symptoms, p = 0.002; total RQLQ score, p = 0.007) and improved objective symptoms (Lund‐Kennedy score, p < 0.001) compared to the control group. Greater reductions (Δ) were observed in eye symptoms ( p = 0.002), emotional ( p = 0.002), and Modified Lund‐Kennedy score ( p < 0.001). Postoperative IL‐5 concentrations were lower in the intervention group ( p = 0.023). Conclusions Concurrent PNN with FESS is both safe and effective, leading to significant improvements in both subjective and objective symptoms in eCRS patients with AR. Cytokine analysis further supports the therapeutic benefits of this combined approach. Level of Evidence 3.

The LaryngoscopeVol. 135(11)
Qingdao University (CN), Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University (CN), Qingdao Women and Children's Hospital (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, Natural Science Foundation of Qingdao
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Sinusitis and nasal conditions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.