Contact behaviors of steel‐formed concrete and autoclaved aerated concrete interfaces in prefabricated structures

Abstract Autoclaved aerated concrete (AAC) wall panels, valued for their lightweight properties, low carbon footprint, and ease of processing, are commonly combined with precast concrete beams and columns to form prefabricated structures with significant potential in residential construction. The rough interfaces between concrete and AAC components play a critical role in load transfer and seismic energy dissipation. This study examines the contact mechanical behavior of steel‐formed concrete and AAC panel interfaces. Laser microscopy was employed to capture the actual surface morphology of both materials, and normal compressive contact and tangential friction tests were conducted on AAC‐to‐AAC and AAC‐to‐concrete interfaces. The W‐M fractal model was used to simulate and generate rough surfaces, while finite element analysis in Abaqus was performed to investigate surface behavior, including actual contact area, material damage, tangential sliding stiffness, and friction coefficient. The results indicate that both AAC and concrete surfaces exhibit self‐affine fractal characteristics, with the bi‐fractal model effectively capturing concrete surface roughness within the scanning scale range. For both interface types, the actual contact area increases with contact pressure. The closure deformation of the contact surfaces initially increases linearly with normal stress, followed by a gradual reduction in growth rate before stabilizing at a constant value. The relationship between normal compressive stress and closure deformation is best described using a two‐stage model combining linear and polynomial functions. Under tangential shear loading, small tangential forces induce relative sliding at the interface, with the friction coefficient increasing elastically with slip displacement. At full plasticity, the tangential friction coefficient stabilizes at 0.76 for AAC‐to‐AAC interfaces and 0.65 for AAC‐to‐concrete interfaces. Parametric analysis further reveals that AAC material strength has minimal influence on surface friction performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Structural Concrete
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.70141
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contact behaviors of steel‐formed concrete and autoclaved aerated concrete interfaces in prefabricated structures

Sicheng Wang, PI Tian-xiang, Huiyun Li, Gong Kaiyuan
1 citations
Structural Concrete
Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
1.01
article

Contact behaviors of steel‐formed concrete and autoclaved aerated concrete interfaces in prefabricated structures

Sicheng Wang, PI Tian-xiang, Huiyun Li, Gong Kaiyuan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Autoclaved aerated concrete (AAC) wall panels, valued for their lightweight properties, low carbon footprint, and ease of processing, are commonly combined with precast concrete beams and columns to form prefabricated structures with significant potential in residential construction. The rough interfaces between concrete and AAC components play a critical role in load transfer and seismic energy dissipation. This study examines the contact mechanical behavior of steel‐formed concrete and AAC panel interfaces. Laser microscopy was employed to capture the actual surface morphology of both materials, and normal compressive contact and tangential friction tests were conducted on AAC‐to‐AAC and AAC‐to‐concrete interfaces. The W‐M fractal model was used to simulate and generate rough surfaces, while finite element analysis in Abaqus was performed to investigate surface behavior, including actual contact area, material damage, tangential sliding stiffness, and friction coefficient. The results indicate that both AAC and concrete surfaces exhibit self‐affine fractal characteristics, with the bi‐fractal model effectively capturing concrete surface roughness within the scanning scale range. For both interface types, the actual contact area increases with contact pressure. The closure deformation of the contact surfaces initially increases linearly with normal stress, followed by a gradual reduction in growth rate before stabilizing at a constant value. The relationship between normal compressive stress and closure deformation is best described using a two‐stage model combining linear and polynomial functions. Under tangential shear loading, small tangential forces induce relative sliding at the interface, with the friction coefficient increasing elastically with slip displacement. At full plasticity, the tangential friction coefficient stabilizes at 0.76 for AAC‐to‐AAC interfaces and 0.65 for AAC‐to‐concrete interfaces. Parametric analysis further reveals that AAC material strength has minimal influence on surface friction performance.

Structural ConcreteVol. 27(1)
Chongqing University (CN), Ministry of Education (TH)
Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
1.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.