Non‐Monotonic Convective Response to Vertical Wind Shear: A Closer Look From Cloud Resolving Model Simulations

Abstract Using a three‐dimensional cloud‐resolving model, a systematic exploration is undertaken of the response of a radiative‐convective equilibrium state to imposed vertical wind shear of varying magnitude. Domain‐averaged surface precipitation exhibits a non‐monotonic sensitivity to increasing shear magnitude, characterized by a decrease with increasing shear for weakly sheared conditions (<1.5 × 10 −3 s −1 ) and an increase under stronger shear (>1.5 × 10 −3 s −1 ), with a similar trend in surface heat fluxes. During the first 30–40 min after wind shear is imposed, convective activity and rainfall are suppressed, which is attributed to increased surface drag and reduced boundary layer eddy kinetic energy. As the shear persists over time, it eventually fosters the development of deep convection. An analysis of the condensed water budget shows that the overall response of the domain‐mean surface precipitation rate to increasing shear magnitude is mainly explained by changes in condensation rate, which in turn is primarily controlled by the cloudy updraft mass flux. In the lower to middle troposphere where most condensation occurs, cloudy updraft fraction steadily increases with increasing shear magnitude, whereas mean updraft vertical velocity exhibits a general decreasing trend as the shear magnitude increases. The compensating responses of updraft fraction and mean vertical velocity explain the non‐monotonic surface precipitation response to vertical wind shear. Vertical shear does not significantly impact the evaporation or precipitation efficiencies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024ms004859
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.30

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Non‐Monotonic Convective Response to Vertical Wind Shear: A Closer Look From Cloud Resolving Model Simulations

Yang Tian, Richard Neale, Hugh Morrison
1 citations
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
1.30
article

Non‐Monotonic Convective Response to Vertical Wind Shear: A Closer Look From Cloud Resolving Model Simulations

Yang Tian, Richard Neale, Hugh Morrison
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Using a three‐dimensional cloud‐resolving model, a systematic exploration is undertaken of the response of a radiative‐convective equilibrium state to imposed vertical wind shear of varying magnitude. Domain‐averaged surface precipitation exhibits a non‐monotonic sensitivity to increasing shear magnitude, characterized by a decrease with increasing shear for weakly sheared conditions (<1.5 × 10 −3 s −1 ) and an increase under stronger shear (>1.5 × 10 −3 s −1 ), with a similar trend in surface heat fluxes. During the first 30–40 min after wind shear is imposed, convective activity and rainfall are suppressed, which is attributed to increased surface drag and reduced boundary layer eddy kinetic energy. As the shear persists over time, it eventually fosters the development of deep convection. An analysis of the condensed water budget shows that the overall response of the domain‐mean surface precipitation rate to increasing shear magnitude is mainly explained by changes in condensation rate, which in turn is primarily controlled by the cloudy updraft mass flux. In the lower to middle troposphere where most condensation occurs, cloudy updraft fraction steadily increases with increasing shear magnitude, whereas mean updraft vertical velocity exhibits a general decreasing trend as the shear magnitude increases. The compensating responses of updraft fraction and mean vertical velocity explain the non‐monotonic surface precipitation response to vertical wind shear. Vertical shear does not significantly impact the evaporation or precipitation efficiencies.

Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth SystemsVol. 17(5)
NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (US)
National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
1.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Non‐Monotonic Convective Response to Vertical Wind Shear: A Closer Look From Cloud Resolving Model Simulations — Yang Tian, Richard Neale, et al. · Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS