Discourse markers as contextual divergence

Abstract This study explores two discourse markers, well in English and isscanha in Korean, in the naturally occurring speech of English-speaking and Korean-speaking children. This corpus-driven analysis proposes a unified core meaning of the two markers as signaling contextual divergence from which varied meanings are derived according to the interactional environments. The interactional meanings of the two discourse markers are remarkably similar: they foreshadow topic shift, mark contrast in various ways, and insist on opinions. Children evidently employ the two markers for achieving discourse coherence, signaling interactional divergence, and enhancing their epistemic stance. The plufunctionality of the focal discourse markers indicates that children are developing interactional competence during the course of spoken language development. The corpus-driven analysis elucidates similarities in the meanings of the markers between the two linguistic groups, and thus adds evidence of interactional resources to the body of literature on spoken language acquisition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Korean Linguistics
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/kl.23009.kim
Primary Topic
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Discourse markers as contextual divergence

Ihnhee Kim
1 links
Korean Linguistics
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
article

Discourse markers as contextual divergence

Ihnhee Kim
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study explores two discourse markers, well in English and isscanha in Korean, in the naturally occurring speech of English-speaking and Korean-speaking children. This corpus-driven analysis proposes a unified core meaning of the two markers as signaling contextual divergence from which varied meanings are derived according to the interactional environments. The interactional meanings of the two discourse markers are remarkably similar: they foreshadow topic shift, mark contrast in various ways, and insist on opinions. Children evidently employ the two markers for achieving discourse coherence, signaling interactional divergence, and enhancing their epistemic stance. The plufunctionality of the focal discourse markers indicates that children are developing interactional competence during the course of spoken language development. The corpus-driven analysis elucidates similarities in the meanings of the markers between the two linguistic groups, and thus adds evidence of interactional resources to the body of literature on spoken language acquisition.

Korean LinguisticsVol. 21(1)
University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.