Comparison of transjugular and transfemoral approaches for leadless pacemaker implantation in asian patients: a retrospective analysis

Abstract Background The transfemoral approach is the conventional method for leadless pacemaker implantation. However, inspired by previous studies suggesting potential advantages of the transjugular approach, we aimed to evaluate its safety and effecacy, especially for smaller-statured Asian patients, in terms of acute procedural outcomes and complications. Methods The case records of all patients who underwent transjugular or transfemoral leadless pacemaker implantation at our center between March 2021 and October 2024 were analyzed retrospectively. The choice of approach was made at the physician's discretion rather than technical feasibility. Results We analyzed 98 patients: 78 were treated via the transfemoral approach, and 20 via the transjugular approach. The mean age was 72.0 years, and 61.2% were male. Device indications, including sinus node dysfunction, atrioventricular block, and atrial fibrillation with slow ventricular response, did not differ significantly between the groups. All devices were positioned at the midseptal area, with no dislodgement reported in either group. The mean number of attempts for successful implantation was 2.3 ± 2.0 overall (2.4 ± 2.1 for transfemoral vs. 2.1 ± 1.6 for transjugular; P = 0.492). There was no significant difference between group in procedural and fluoroscopic times, paced QRS duration, or pacing parameters, including pacing threshold, impedance, and sensed amplitude. Howver the transjugular group had a significantly lower rate of puncture site complications (5.0% vs. 35.9%, P = 0.025; odds ratio 10.6, 95% CI: 1.35–83.77) and a shorter procedure-to-discharge time (1.4 ± 0.6 vs. 2.2 ± 1.4 days, P = 0.039). Conclusion The transjugular approach for leadless pacemaker implantation appears to offer a lower rate of puncture site complications with comparable efficacy to the transfemoral approach, suggesting a viable alternative in Asian patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EP Europace
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euaf085.551
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of transjugular and transfemoral approaches for leadless pacemaker implantation in asian patients: a retrospective analysis

K M Park, Jin Woo Kim, Ji Young Kim, S J Park et al.
1 citations
EP Europace
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
1.39
article

Comparison of transjugular and transfemoral approaches for leadless pacemaker implantation in asian patients: a retrospective analysis

K M Park, Jin Woo Kim, Ji Young Kim, S J Park, Y K On
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background The transfemoral approach is the conventional method for leadless pacemaker implantation. However, inspired by previous studies suggesting potential advantages of the transjugular approach, we aimed to evaluate its safety and effecacy, especially for smaller-statured Asian patients, in terms of acute procedural outcomes and complications. Methods The case records of all patients who underwent transjugular or transfemoral leadless pacemaker implantation at our center between March 2021 and October 2024 were analyzed retrospectively. The choice of approach was made at the physician's discretion rather than technical feasibility. Results We analyzed 98 patients: 78 were treated via the transfemoral approach, and 20 via the transjugular approach. The mean age was 72.0 years, and 61.2% were male. Device indications, including sinus node dysfunction, atrioventricular block, and atrial fibrillation with slow ventricular response, did not differ significantly between the groups. All devices were positioned at the midseptal area, with no dislodgement reported in either group. The mean number of attempts for successful implantation was 2.3 ± 2.0 overall (2.4 ± 2.1 for transfemoral vs. 2.1 ± 1.6 for transjugular; P = 0.492). There was no significant difference between group in procedural and fluoroscopic times, paced QRS duration, or pacing parameters, including pacing threshold, impedance, and sensed amplitude. Howver the transjugular group had a significantly lower rate of puncture site complications (5.0% vs. 35.9%, P = 0.025; odds ratio 10.6, 95% CI: 1.35–83.77) and a shorter procedure-to-discharge time (1.4 ± 0.6 vs. 2.2 ± 1.4 days, P = 0.039). Conclusion The transjugular approach for leadless pacemaker implantation appears to offer a lower rate of puncture site complications with comparable efficacy to the transfemoral approach, suggesting a viable alternative in Asian patients.

EP EuropaceVol. 27(Supplement_1)
Samsung Medical Center (KR), Sungkyunkwan University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.