Determining a role for Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) in genomic data governance for cancer care

Comprehensive collections of cancer data, including genomic data, are needed to improve cancer risk prediction and treatments. A recent government review, Better, Broader, Safer: Using health data for research and analysis, has argued for high-quality Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) for ethical data use. In this paper we determine a role and justification for PPIE to govern uses of genomic data in fields like cancer. First, we analyse two public attitudes studies about the role of PPIE in genomics governance. Second, we characterise two ethically-significant features of the context of governing genomic data: 1) data aggregation leading to novel group formation, and 2) the hybrid territory of genomic cancer data uses. Thirdly, we bring together these aspects to describe a fully determined role for PPIE within an approach to governing cancer genomic data, which is tailored to major areas of ethical consideration. Our account is a novel interpretation of what PPIE is for in governance, how it may foster public support and how its success in so doing depends on it being tailored to context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Human Genetics
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-025-01866-1
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.76

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Determining a role for Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) in genomic data governance for cancer care

Nina Hallowell, Kate Sahan, Anneke Lucassen, Lesley Turner et al.
2 citations
European Journal of Human Genetics
Ethics in Clinical Research
3.76
article

Determining a role for Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) in genomic data governance for cancer care

Nina Hallowell, Kate Sahan, Anneke Lucassen, Lesley Turner, Michael Parker
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Comprehensive collections of cancer data, including genomic data, are needed to improve cancer risk prediction and treatments. A recent government review, Better, Broader, Safer: Using health data for research and analysis, has argued for high-quality Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) for ethical data use. In this paper we determine a role and justification for PPIE to govern uses of genomic data in fields like cancer. First, we analyse two public attitudes studies about the role of PPIE in genomics governance. Second, we characterise two ethically-significant features of the context of governing genomic data: 1) data aggregation leading to novel group formation, and 2) the hybrid territory of genomic cancer data uses. Thirdly, we bring together these aspects to describe a fully determined role for PPIE within an approach to governing cancer genomic data, which is tailored to major areas of ethical consideration. Our account is a novel interpretation of what PPIE is for in governance, how it may foster public support and how its success in so doing depends on it being tailored to context.

European Journal of Human Genetics
Centre for Human Genetics (GB), University of Oxford (GB), Centre For Human Genetics (IN), Canon (United Kingdom) (GB), Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities (GB)
Wellcome, Wellcome Trust, Cancer Research UK
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Ethics in Clinical Research
3.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.