Multi-layer perceptron neural network-based algorithm for automatic external defibrillator

Abstract Background Traditional rule-based automatic external defibrillator (AED) algorithms encounter difficulties in accurately classifying electrocardiograms (ECGs) in the borderline area. To overcome this limitation, we have developed an artificial intelligence (AI)-based AED algorithm. Methods We utilized open-source databases, hospital ECG databases, and AED databases, acquiring a total of 1,551,089 segments. For the learning phase, 14,000 shockable (25%) and 42,000 non-shockable segments (75%) were allocated. Deep learning was conducted using Multi-layer Perceptron Neural Networks (MLPNN) and fully connected neural networks (FCNN). ECG-feature extractions included threshold crossing sample count (TCSC), ventricular fibrillation-filter leak (VF-leak), phase space reconstruction (PSR), QRS complex features (bCP, bWT, bW), heart rate (bpm), standard deviation of RR interval (RR-std), and standard deviation of peak QRS amplitude (Peak-std). The MLPNN configuration included four hidden layers (see Figures 1 and 2). Activation functions such as hyperbolic tangent, softmax, and sigmoid were applied, with Binary Cross-Entropy serving as the loss function. To prevent overfitting, a 10-fold cross-validation approach was employed. Results Testing on database segments (n = 1,468,879) demonstrated an accuracy of 99.79%, a precision of 98.66%, a recall of 93.67%, and an F1 score of 96.10%. Sensitivity for ventricular fibrillation was 98.7%, ventricular tachycardia sensitivity was 81.0%, normal sinus rhythm specificity was 100%, asystole specificity was 100%, and non-shockable rhythm specificity was 99.8%. Overall sensitivity was 93.67%, specificity was 99.96%, and the AUC was 96.82%. Conclusion The MLPNN-based AED algorithm, incorporating ECG-feature extractions (TCSC, VF-leak, PSR, bCP, bWT, bW, bpm, RR-std, and Peak-std), exhibited high accuracy, good precision, and reproducibility

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EP Europace
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euaf085.817
Primary Topic
Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-layer perceptron neural network-based algorithm for automatic external defibrillator

Sir-yeon Hong, Bong‐Ki Lee, Namsik Yoon
EP Europace
Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
article

Multi-layer perceptron neural network-based algorithm for automatic external defibrillator

Sir-yeon Hong, Bong‐Ki Lee, Namsik Yoon
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Traditional rule-based automatic external defibrillator (AED) algorithms encounter difficulties in accurately classifying electrocardiograms (ECGs) in the borderline area. To overcome this limitation, we have developed an artificial intelligence (AI)-based AED algorithm. Methods We utilized open-source databases, hospital ECG databases, and AED databases, acquiring a total of 1,551,089 segments. For the learning phase, 14,000 shockable (25%) and 42,000 non-shockable segments (75%) were allocated. Deep learning was conducted using Multi-layer Perceptron Neural Networks (MLPNN) and fully connected neural networks (FCNN). ECG-feature extractions included threshold crossing sample count (TCSC), ventricular fibrillation-filter leak (VF-leak), phase space reconstruction (PSR), QRS complex features (bCP, bWT, bW), heart rate (bpm), standard deviation of RR interval (RR-std), and standard deviation of peak QRS amplitude (Peak-std). The MLPNN configuration included four hidden layers (see Figures 1 and 2). Activation functions such as hyperbolic tangent, softmax, and sigmoid were applied, with Binary Cross-Entropy serving as the loss function. To prevent overfitting, a 10-fold cross-validation approach was employed. Results Testing on database segments (n = 1,468,879) demonstrated an accuracy of 99.79%, a precision of 98.66%, a recall of 93.67%, and an F1 score of 96.10%. Sensitivity for ventricular fibrillation was 98.7%, ventricular tachycardia sensitivity was 81.0%, normal sinus rhythm specificity was 100%, asystole specificity was 100%, and non-shockable rhythm specificity was 99.8%. Overall sensitivity was 93.67%, specificity was 99.96%, and the AUC was 96.82%. Conclusion The MLPNN-based AED algorithm, incorporating ECG-feature extractions (TCSC, VF-leak, PSR, bCP, bWT, bW, bpm, RR-std, and Peak-std), exhibited high accuracy, good precision, and reproducibility

EP EuropaceVol. 27(Supplement_1)
Kwangju Christian Hospital (KR), Chonnam National University Hospital (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.