Sex differences in electrophysiological characteristics of left bundle branch area pacing

Abstract Background Conduction system pacing (CSP) with left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is a novel and promising technique for pacemaker implantation. However, sex differences in the electrophysiological characteristics of LBBAP and its potential impact on CSP criteria have not yet been thoroughly studied. Purpose To assess sex differences in the electrophysiological characteristics of LBBAP. Methods We prospectively included 218 consecutive patients, undergoing LBBAP at a tertiary center between April 2022 and October 2024, into our CSP registry. LBBAP capture types included proximal left bundle pacing (LBP), left bundle fascicular pacing (LBFP), and left ventricular septal pacing (LVSP). Intracardiac electrograms and surface electrograms were recorded at a speed of 100 mm/s. We compared sex differences in pre- and intraprocedural electrophysiological parameters. Results Overall, median age was 76 (IQR 68-82) years, and 62 (28%) patients were female. The three most frequent indications for pacemaker implantation were high-grade AV block (68%), sick-sinus syndrome (6.5%) and atrial fibrillation (4.6%). Compared to men, female patients undergoing LBBAP were older (80 vs. 75 years, p=0.011) and had a lower BMI (25.2 vs. 26.7 kg/m2, p=0.041). There was no sex difference in pacemaker indications, comorbidities, or procedural length (Figure). In the preprocedural ECG, women had shorter QRS durations than men (104 vs. 127 ms, p <0.001). After lead placement, the distribution of different LBBAP capture types was similar between sexes. However, women had a shorter paced QRS duration than men (112 vs. 119 ms, p=0.016) and a shorter V6 R-wave peak time (V6RWPT) (70 vs. 80 ms, p=0.002), but similar V6-V1 interpeak interval (25 vs. 30 ms, p=0.7). There were no differences in ventricular sensing (10.3 vs. 10.0 mV, p=0.4), bipolar threshold (0.85 vs 0.80 V, p=0.7), and bipolar impedance (767 vs. 741 Ohm, p=0.4). Conclusion In patients undergoing LBBAP, women had shorter paced QRS durations and V6RWPT compared to men. Our findings indicate a faster left ventricular activation with LBBAP in women and suggest, that electrophysiological criteria for CSP may need to be different in women compared to men.Graphical Abstract

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EP Europace
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euaf085.550
Primary Topic
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sex differences in electrophysiological characteristics of left bundle branch area pacing

Philipp Krisai, Melina Krempke, Bill Subin, Julia Pouly et al.
EP Europace
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
article

Sex differences in electrophysiological characteristics of left bundle branch area pacing

Philipp Krisai, Melina Krempke, Bill Subin, Julia Pouly, Felix Mahfoud, Beat Schaer, Patrick Badertscher, Sven Knecht, Christian Sticherling, K Bulatova, David Spreen, N Schaerli, M Kuehne
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Conduction system pacing (CSP) with left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is a novel and promising technique for pacemaker implantation. However, sex differences in the electrophysiological characteristics of LBBAP and its potential impact on CSP criteria have not yet been thoroughly studied. Purpose To assess sex differences in the electrophysiological characteristics of LBBAP. Methods We prospectively included 218 consecutive patients, undergoing LBBAP at a tertiary center between April 2022 and October 2024, into our CSP registry. LBBAP capture types included proximal left bundle pacing (LBP), left bundle fascicular pacing (LBFP), and left ventricular septal pacing (LVSP). Intracardiac electrograms and surface electrograms were recorded at a speed of 100 mm/s. We compared sex differences in pre- and intraprocedural electrophysiological parameters. Results Overall, median age was 76 (IQR 68-82) years, and 62 (28%) patients were female. The three most frequent indications for pacemaker implantation were high-grade AV block (68%), sick-sinus syndrome (6.5%) and atrial fibrillation (4.6%). Compared to men, female patients undergoing LBBAP were older (80 vs. 75 years, p=0.011) and had a lower BMI (25.2 vs. 26.7 kg/m2, p=0.041). There was no sex difference in pacemaker indications, comorbidities, or procedural length (Figure). In the preprocedural ECG, women had shorter QRS durations than men (104 vs. 127 ms, p <0.001). After lead placement, the distribution of different LBBAP capture types was similar between sexes. However, women had a shorter paced QRS duration than men (112 vs. 119 ms, p=0.016) and a shorter V6 R-wave peak time (V6RWPT) (70 vs. 80 ms, p=0.002), but similar V6-V1 interpeak interval (25 vs. 30 ms, p=0.7). There were no differences in ventricular sensing (10.3 vs. 10.0 mV, p=0.4), bipolar threshold (0.85 vs 0.80 V, p=0.7), and bipolar impedance (767 vs. 741 Ohm, p=0.4). Conclusion In patients undergoing LBBAP, women had shorter paced QRS durations and V6RWPT compared to men. Our findings indicate a faster left ventricular activation with LBBAP in women and suggest, that electrophysiological criteria for CSP may need to be different in women compared to men.Graphical Abstract

EP EuropaceVol. 27(Supplement_1)
Cardiovascular Institute Hospital (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.