In-hospital outcomes of left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion among cancer patients with atrial fibrillation: a nationwide US study

Abstract Introduction AF is frequently observed in patients with cancer, driven by mutual comorbidities. The risk of thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events escalates significantly for individuals with both AF and cancer. Impediments can hinder the utilization of anticoagulants among patients with malignancy: drug interactions with chemotherapy, renal dysfunction, drug intolerance, and increased bleeding risk. LAA occlusion (LAAO) is an effective and safe non-pharmacological approach to prevent thromboembolic complications when anticoagulants are not suitable. Cancer patients were generally excluded from the original LAAO trials, and current efficacy and safety of LAAO in patients with cancer is unknown. Methods Using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database, patients who underwent LAAO in the US between 2016 and 2019 were identified using ICD10 codes. Sociodemographic, clinical data, in-hospital procedures and outcomes and length-of-stay (LOS) were collected. Baseline characteristics and in-hospital outcomes were compared between patients with and without cancer. Results An estimated total of 61,395 hospitalizations for LAAO were performed during the study period. 61% of patients were male and 2.1% had a cancer diagnosis. Older age, male gender, prior stroke, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and anemia were more prevalent in the cancer group with 825(57%) having a solid malignancy, and hematologic malignancy in 610(43%). In-hospital complications occurred in 3520 LAAO patients (5.7%). Patients with cancer diagnosis had a higher rates of total in-hospital complications (9% vs 5.7%;p<0.001), driven by acute kidney injury(3.2% vs 1.8%;p=0.002) and infectious complications (4.3% vs. 2.4%;p<0.001). No significant differences were observed in cardiac, respiratory complications, periprocedural stroke and in-hospital mortality. Average LOS was longer in cancer patients. Conclusions LAAO in cancer patients is associated with increased kidney and infectious complications, but not with cardiac complications or increased in-hospital mortality in a nationwide, all-comer registry. These findings suggest LAAO as a safe treatment option for managing embolic prevention in cancer patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EP Europace
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euaf085.508
Primary Topic
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In-hospital outcomes of left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion among cancer patients with atrial fibrillation: a nationwide US study

Gilad Margolis, Mark Kazatsker, Ariel Roguin, Lev Vishnevskiy
EP Europace
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
article

In-hospital outcomes of left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion among cancer patients with atrial fibrillation: a nationwide US study

Gilad Margolis, Mark Kazatsker, Ariel Roguin, Lev Vishnevskiy
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction AF is frequently observed in patients with cancer, driven by mutual comorbidities. The risk of thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events escalates significantly for individuals with both AF and cancer. Impediments can hinder the utilization of anticoagulants among patients with malignancy: drug interactions with chemotherapy, renal dysfunction, drug intolerance, and increased bleeding risk. LAA occlusion (LAAO) is an effective and safe non-pharmacological approach to prevent thromboembolic complications when anticoagulants are not suitable. Cancer patients were generally excluded from the original LAAO trials, and current efficacy and safety of LAAO in patients with cancer is unknown. Methods Using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database, patients who underwent LAAO in the US between 2016 and 2019 were identified using ICD10 codes. Sociodemographic, clinical data, in-hospital procedures and outcomes and length-of-stay (LOS) were collected. Baseline characteristics and in-hospital outcomes were compared between patients with and without cancer. Results An estimated total of 61,395 hospitalizations for LAAO were performed during the study period. 61% of patients were male and 2.1% had a cancer diagnosis. Older age, male gender, prior stroke, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and anemia were more prevalent in the cancer group with 825(57%) having a solid malignancy, and hematologic malignancy in 610(43%). In-hospital complications occurred in 3520 LAAO patients (5.7%). Patients with cancer diagnosis had a higher rates of total in-hospital complications (9% vs 5.7%;p<0.001), driven by acute kidney injury(3.2% vs 1.8%;p=0.002) and infectious complications (4.3% vs. 2.4%;p<0.001). No significant differences were observed in cardiac, respiratory complications, periprocedural stroke and in-hospital mortality. Average LOS was longer in cancer patients. Conclusions LAAO in cancer patients is associated with increased kidney and infectious complications, but not with cardiac complications or increased in-hospital mortality in a nationwide, all-comer registry. These findings suggest LAAO as a safe treatment option for managing embolic prevention in cancer patients.

EP EuropaceVol. 27(Supplement_1)
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL), Hillel Yaffe Medical Center (IL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.