His bundle pacing: development of chronic thresholds - a single-center experience over 8 years in 529 patients

Abstract Background Conduction system pacing (CSP) is increasingly used to avoid the development of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy in patients who require a high amount of ventricular pacing. His bundle pacing (HBP) leads to a physiologic ventricular activation via His-Purkinje conduction system. It is considered as ideal to achieve the narrowest paced QRS and optimal synchronization in patients with intrinsic narrow QRS or right bundle branch block, there are however concerns about low implantation success rates and an acute and chronic threshold increase. Purpose The aim of this study was to analyze our experience with HBP in terms of implantation success rate, chronic pacing thresholds, the incidence of dislodgements and consecutive clinical events. Methods In this single center registry, all consecutive patients in whom HBP was attempted during the period from June 2016 to October 2024 were enrolled prospectively. Data on patient characteristics, medical history, implantation success, sensing and pacing parameters over 36 months were collected. Furthermore, threshold increase ≥3.5V/1.0 ms, loss of capture, His bundle lead dislodgement and consecutive clinical events were analyzed. Results HBP was attempted in 529 patients (78±18 years, 39% female, 92% AV block, left ventricular ejection fraction 53±10%, 93 single-, 352 dual-, 56 triple-chamber pacemakers, 4 dual- and 24 triple-chamber ICDs). HBP implantation was successful in 503 (95.1%) of these patients (222 non-selective HBP, 254 selective HBP, and 17 LBBAP). Sensing and pacing parameters at implantation and during follow-up are shown in the Figure. Over time, there were 19 (3.6%) pacing threshold increases ≥3.5V/1.0 ms, 1 (0.2%) loss of capture (patient with sinus node disease) and 4 (0.7%) lead dislodgements (2 patients with Twiddler syndrome), in total 24 events in 36 months (4.5%). Of the patients with HBP threshold increase, 5 patients had a previously implanted right ventricular backup lead, 4 patients had non-selective HBP with myocardial capture serving as a "back-up", in 4 patients a new right ventricular lead was implanted and in one patient LBBAP was performed. There were no clinical events due to threshold increase or loss of HBP capture. Conclusion HBP implantation success rates of ≥ 95% can be achieved. Over 36 months there is a modest pacing threshold increase from 1.0 to 1.6V/1.0 ms. This threshold increase did not cause any clinically relevant events in our patient cohort.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EP Europace
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euaf085.566
Primary Topic
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

His bundle pacing: development of chronic thresholds - a single-center experience over 8 years in 529 patients

Arsen Yu. Grigoryan, Sona Tribunyan, T Feldmann, Carsten W. Israel et al.
EP Europace
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
article

His bundle pacing: development of chronic thresholds - a single-center experience over 8 years in 529 patients

Arsen Yu. Grigoryan, Sona Tribunyan, T Feldmann, Carsten W. Israel, M Foeldvary, C Bachour
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Conduction system pacing (CSP) is increasingly used to avoid the development of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy in patients who require a high amount of ventricular pacing. His bundle pacing (HBP) leads to a physiologic ventricular activation via His-Purkinje conduction system. It is considered as ideal to achieve the narrowest paced QRS and optimal synchronization in patients with intrinsic narrow QRS or right bundle branch block, there are however concerns about low implantation success rates and an acute and chronic threshold increase. Purpose The aim of this study was to analyze our experience with HBP in terms of implantation success rate, chronic pacing thresholds, the incidence of dislodgements and consecutive clinical events. Methods In this single center registry, all consecutive patients in whom HBP was attempted during the period from June 2016 to October 2024 were enrolled prospectively. Data on patient characteristics, medical history, implantation success, sensing and pacing parameters over 36 months were collected. Furthermore, threshold increase ≥3.5V/1.0 ms, loss of capture, His bundle lead dislodgement and consecutive clinical events were analyzed. Results HBP was attempted in 529 patients (78±18 years, 39% female, 92% AV block, left ventricular ejection fraction 53±10%, 93 single-, 352 dual-, 56 triple-chamber pacemakers, 4 dual- and 24 triple-chamber ICDs). HBP implantation was successful in 503 (95.1%) of these patients (222 non-selective HBP, 254 selective HBP, and 17 LBBAP). Sensing and pacing parameters at implantation and during follow-up are shown in the Figure. Over time, there were 19 (3.6%) pacing threshold increases ≥3.5V/1.0 ms, 1 (0.2%) loss of capture (patient with sinus node disease) and 4 (0.7%) lead dislodgements (2 patients with Twiddler syndrome), in total 24 events in 36 months (4.5%). Of the patients with HBP threshold increase, 5 patients had a previously implanted right ventricular backup lead, 4 patients had non-selective HBP with myocardial capture serving as a "back-up", in 4 patients a new right ventricular lead was implanted and in one patient LBBAP was performed. There were no clinical events due to threshold increase or loss of HBP capture. Conclusion HBP implantation success rates of ≥ 95% can be achieved. Over 36 months there is a modest pacing threshold increase from 1.0 to 1.6V/1.0 ms. This threshold increase did not cause any clinically relevant events in our patient cohort.

EP EuropaceVol. 27(Supplement_1)
Bethel University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.