Left bundle branch area pacing: longitudinal data on pacing efficacy

Abstract Background Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has gained recognition as a technique for physiological ventricular pacing that maintains left ventricular (LV) synchrony. Although procedural characteristics are increasingly documented, information on longer terms lead stability remains scarce. We aimed to evaluate the procedural features and the stability of pacing parameters over a mid-term follow-up. Methods Single centre study including consecutive patients undergoing LBBAP from 2021 to 2024. Data on procedural characteristics, lead parameters, and final QRS duration were gathered immediately post-implantation and throughout follow-up. Criteria for confirming conduction system capture with LBBAP was defined according to current recommendations. Results Overall, 205 consecutive patients were included (mean age 77±12 years and 64% male). Procedural duration was 63min (IQR 51-80) and fluoroscopy time was 4.9min (IQR 2.9-7.8). Median LVAT was 86ms (IQR 78-96), paced QRS immediately after implantation was 112ms (IQR 104-120) and interpeak V1-V6 was 38ms (30-44). Acute R-wave amplitude and pacing threshold were 11.4 mV (IQR 6.9-15.7) and 0.5 mV (IQR 0.5-0.7), respectively. One case of in-hospital ischemic stroke associated with withholding anticoagulation in a patient with atrial fibrillation and 1 case of electrode dislocation with successful replacement were reported at discharge. No other major complications were reported. Over a median follow-up of 7.9 months (IQR 2.3-15.3), both the pacing threshold (0.6 mV [IQR 0.5-0.75]) and R-wave amplitude [12.3 mV (IQR 9.0-19.3)] remained stable. QRS duration, a surrogate of LV synchrony, remained narrow: 120ms (IQR 110-122). Conclusion In this cohort, LBBAP proved feasible, demonstrating excellent pacing parameters that remained stable throughout the mid-term follow-up. QRS duration remained consistently short, further underscoring the potential of this technique in maintaining LV synchrony.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EP Europace
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euaf085.568
Primary Topic
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Left bundle branch area pacing: longitudinal data on pacing efficacy

Francisco Moscoso Costa, Diogo Cavaco, Pedro Carmo, João Carmo et al.
EP Europace
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
article

Left bundle branch area pacing: longitudinal data on pacing efficacy

Francisco Moscoso Costa, Diogo Cavaco, Pedro Carmo, João Carmo, Pedro Adragão, Daniel Matos, Dawidson Assis Gomes, I Santos, Joana Pereira, Rita Sousa, G Rodrigues, Francisco Morgado, R Reis Santos, P Galvao Santos
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has gained recognition as a technique for physiological ventricular pacing that maintains left ventricular (LV) synchrony. Although procedural characteristics are increasingly documented, information on longer terms lead stability remains scarce. We aimed to evaluate the procedural features and the stability of pacing parameters over a mid-term follow-up. Methods Single centre study including consecutive patients undergoing LBBAP from 2021 to 2024. Data on procedural characteristics, lead parameters, and final QRS duration were gathered immediately post-implantation and throughout follow-up. Criteria for confirming conduction system capture with LBBAP was defined according to current recommendations. Results Overall, 205 consecutive patients were included (mean age 77±12 years and 64% male). Procedural duration was 63min (IQR 51-80) and fluoroscopy time was 4.9min (IQR 2.9-7.8). Median LVAT was 86ms (IQR 78-96), paced QRS immediately after implantation was 112ms (IQR 104-120) and interpeak V1-V6 was 38ms (30-44). Acute R-wave amplitude and pacing threshold were 11.4 mV (IQR 6.9-15.7) and 0.5 mV (IQR 0.5-0.7), respectively. One case of in-hospital ischemic stroke associated with withholding anticoagulation in a patient with atrial fibrillation and 1 case of electrode dislocation with successful replacement were reported at discharge. No other major complications were reported. Over a median follow-up of 7.9 months (IQR 2.3-15.3), both the pacing threshold (0.6 mV [IQR 0.5-0.75]) and R-wave amplitude [12.3 mV (IQR 9.0-19.3)] remained stable. QRS duration, a surrogate of LV synchrony, remained narrow: 120ms (IQR 110-122). Conclusion In this cohort, LBBAP proved feasible, demonstrating excellent pacing parameters that remained stable throughout the mid-term follow-up. QRS duration remained consistently short, further underscoring the potential of this technique in maintaining LV synchrony.

EP EuropaceVol. 27(Supplement_1)
Hospital de Santa Cruz (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.