Digitally signed art objects and their community-driven infrastructures in the light of Fluxus’ event scores

In this article, I will elaborate on the unique aesthetics of digitally signed art objects, exploring their relationship with the infrastructures and communities that support them, as well as the cultural practices they nurture. I will provide historical context by comparing these aspects to the collaborative nature of the Fluxus movement. Many theorists have already drawn parallels between the Fluxus movement’s emphasis on collaboration, distributed authorship, and audience engagement and contemporary digital art practices, e.g., Christiane Paul and Owen Smith. I aim to explore the differences between the communities that emerge from Fluxus’ collaborative practices and those shaped by the infrastructure-driven crypto art scene. My main argument is that the latter fosters a distinct type of community and practice intertwined with market and mass media dynamics, resulting in unique memetic qualities and a shift from distributed to decentralized authorship.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Prace Kulturoznawcze
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.19195/0860-6668.29.1.3
Primary Topic
Museums and Cultural Heritage
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digitally signed art objects and their community-driven infrastructures in the light of Fluxus’ event scores

Georg Eckmayr
Prace Kulturoznawcze
Museums and Cultural Heritage
article

Digitally signed art objects and their community-driven infrastructures in the light of Fluxus’ event scores

Georg Eckmayr
article en

Abstract

In this article, I will elaborate on the unique aesthetics of digitally signed art objects, exploring their relationship with the infrastructures and communities that support them, as well as the cultural practices they nurture. I will provide historical context by comparing these aspects to the collaborative nature of the Fluxus movement. Many theorists have already drawn parallels between the Fluxus movement’s emphasis on collaboration, distributed authorship, and audience engagement and contemporary digital art practices, e.g., Christiane Paul and Owen Smith. I aim to explore the differences between the communities that emerge from Fluxus’ collaborative practices and those shaped by the infrastructure-driven crypto art scene. My main argument is that the latter fosters a distinct type of community and practice intertwined with market and mass media dynamics, resulting in unique memetic qualities and a shift from distributed to decentralized authorship.

Prace KulturoznawczeVol. 29(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Museums and Cultural Heritage
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Digitally signed art objects and their community-driven infrastructures in the light of Fluxus’ event scores — Georg Eckmayr · Prace Kulturoznawcze (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS