Assessment of the optimal reaction conditions and catalyst combinations for production of carbon negative hydrogen from supercritical water gasification of microalgae

Supercritical water gasification of microalgae offers a solution to hydrogen production that can simultaneously capture carbon from the atmosphere as both CO 2 and solid biochar, without some of the negative environmental impacts of other biomass sources. Investigation into the influences of temperature (400–600 °C), biomass concentration (1-3 wt%), Oxidant Coefficient (0–0.5), heterogenous catalysts (Ru/C) and homogenous catalysts (KOH, 0-1 wt%) was carried out by integrating experimental results into a system model in ASPEN plus®. High temperatures and ruthenium catalyst were found to be preferable for both experimental and whole system approaches at maximising hydrogen yield and efficiency. However, despite being favourable in the reaction, low concentrations were not favourable in the integrated system, due to differences in heat recovery and pumping power. Similarly, the influence of oxidant and KOH showed a more complex influence on the whole system than is currently understood in SCWG reactions. As a result, a maximum hydrogen yield of 12.7 mg/g was achieved, with 38 % and 30 % of the carbon being captured as gas and solid respectively, at 600 °C, 2 wt% algae, 1 wt % KOH, Ru/C catalyst and a 0.3 oxidant coefficient. • Effect of temperature, biomass concentration, 2 catalyst types and H 2 O 2 considered. • Results incorporated into integrated system model to make H 2 and capture carbon. • System model results showed significant variation to equilibrium models. • High Temperature and Ru/C were favourable for H 2 production. • Parabolic relationship for algal, KOH and H 2 O 2 concentrations on H 2 production.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomass and Bioenergy
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.107983
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Subcritical and Supercritical Water Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.67

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of the optimal reaction conditions and catalyst combinations for production of carbon negative hydrogen from supercritical water gasification of microalgae

John Love, Bushra Al‐Duri, Brian Glover, Lynne E. Macaskie et al.
1 citations
Biomass and Bioenergy
Subcritical and Supercritical Water Processes
0.67
article

Assessment of the optimal reaction conditions and catalyst combinations for production of carbon negative hydrogen from supercritical water gasification of microalgae

John Love, Bushra Al‐Duri, Brian Glover, Lynne E. Macaskie, Kieran Heeley, Rafael L. Orozco
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Supercritical water gasification of microalgae offers a solution to hydrogen production that can simultaneously capture carbon from the atmosphere as both CO 2 and solid biochar, without some of the negative environmental impacts of other biomass sources. Investigation into the influences of temperature (400–600 °C), biomass concentration (1-3 wt%), Oxidant Coefficient (0–0.5), heterogenous catalysts (Ru/C) and homogenous catalysts (KOH, 0-1 wt%) was carried out by integrating experimental results into a system model in ASPEN plus®. High temperatures and ruthenium catalyst were found to be preferable for both experimental and whole system approaches at maximising hydrogen yield and efficiency. However, despite being favourable in the reaction, low concentrations were not favourable in the integrated system, due to differences in heat recovery and pumping power. Similarly, the influence of oxidant and KOH showed a more complex influence on the whole system than is currently understood in SCWG reactions. As a result, a maximum hydrogen yield of 12.7 mg/g was achieved, with 38 % and 30 % of the carbon being captured as gas and solid respectively, at 600 °C, 2 wt% algae, 1 wt % KOH, Ru/C catalyst and a 0.3 oxidant coefficient. • Effect of temperature, biomass concentration, 2 catalyst types and H 2 O 2 considered. • Results incorporated into integrated system model to make H 2 and capture carbon. • System model results showed significant variation to equilibrium models. • High Temperature and Ru/C were favourable for H 2 production. • Parabolic relationship for algal, KOH and H 2 O 2 concentrations on H 2 production.

Biomass and BioenergyVol. 200
University of Exeter (GB), Biocatalysts (United Kingdom) (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Subcritical and Supercritical Water Processes
0.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.