Analytical Green Star Area (AGSA) as a new tool to assess greenness of analytical methods

The field of Green Chemistry (GC) and Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) has led to the development of multiple metrics designed to assess the impact of analytical methods. Among these, the Analytical Eco-Scale (AES) provides a quantitative evaluation but lacks visual representation, limiting intuitive assessment. The Green Analytical Procedure Index (GAPI) and its variant offer graphical evaluation, yet they lack a total scoring system, making direct comparisons difficult. While ModifiedGAPI (MoGAPI) and ComplexMoGAPI provide a total score for each method, their assessment is not directly structured around the principles of GAC, relying instead on 16 and 27 predefined questions, respectively. In contrast, the Analytical GREEnness (AGREE) Metric is explicitly structured around the 12 principles of GAC. However, it does not classify analytical methods based on total scores, is less resistant to user bias, and lacks an analogous metric in GC. To bridge these gaps, the Analytical Green Star Area (AGSA) introduces a comprehensive, built-in scoring, and visually intuitive approach to method evaluation. AGSA integrates method classification, built-in scoring and resistance to user bias, ensuring objective assessment while maintaining alignment with the 12 Principles of GAC. Furthermore, AGSA is an extension of an analogous metric from GC, and is available as an open source at bit.ly/AGSA2025, facilitating interdisciplinary comparisons. Multiple case studies are analyzed, demonstrating its effectiveness in distinguishing analytical methods based on their environmental impact. These findings highlight AGSA as a versatile, consistent, and practical tool for promoting sustainability in analytical laboratories while overcoming the limitations of existing greenness metrics. • AGSA is a comprehensive, and visually intuitive approach to greenness evaluation. • AGSA is an extension of the green star area metric in green chemistry. • The tool is available as a free to use open source at bit.ly/AGSA2025 • AGSA was favorably compared with other greenness metrics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scp.2025.102051
Citations
75
Primary Topic
Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
56.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analytical Green Star Area (AGSA) as a new tool to assess greenness of analytical methods

Alaa Bedair, Galal Magdy, Fotouh R. Mansour, Fathalla Belal et al.
75 citations
Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy
Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals
56.43
article

Analytical Green Star Area (AGSA) as a new tool to assess greenness of analytical methods

Alaa Bedair, Galal Magdy, Fotouh R. Mansour, Fathalla Belal, Marcello Locatelli
article en
75 citations

Abstract

The field of Green Chemistry (GC) and Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) has led to the development of multiple metrics designed to assess the impact of analytical methods. Among these, the Analytical Eco-Scale (AES) provides a quantitative evaluation but lacks visual representation, limiting intuitive assessment. The Green Analytical Procedure Index (GAPI) and its variant offer graphical evaluation, yet they lack a total scoring system, making direct comparisons difficult. While ModifiedGAPI (MoGAPI) and ComplexMoGAPI provide a total score for each method, their assessment is not directly structured around the principles of GAC, relying instead on 16 and 27 predefined questions, respectively. In contrast, the Analytical GREEnness (AGREE) Metric is explicitly structured around the 12 principles of GAC. However, it does not classify analytical methods based on total scores, is less resistant to user bias, and lacks an analogous metric in GC. To bridge these gaps, the Analytical Green Star Area (AGSA) introduces a comprehensive, built-in scoring, and visually intuitive approach to method evaluation. AGSA integrates method classification, built-in scoring and resistance to user bias, ensuring objective assessment while maintaining alignment with the 12 Principles of GAC. Furthermore, AGSA is an extension of an analogous metric from GC, and is available as an open source at bit.ly/AGSA2025, facilitating interdisciplinary comparisons. Multiple case studies are analyzed, demonstrating its effectiveness in distinguishing analytical methods based on their environmental impact. These findings highlight AGSA as a versatile, consistent, and practical tool for promoting sustainability in analytical laboratories while overcoming the limitations of existing greenness metrics. • AGSA is a comprehensive, and visually intuitive approach to greenness evaluation. • AGSA is an extension of the green star area metric in green chemistry. • The tool is available as a free to use open source at bit.ly/AGSA2025 • AGSA was favorably compared with other greenness metrics.

Sustainable Chemistry and PharmacyVol. 46
Kafrelsheikh University (EG), Mansoura University (EG), Tanta University (EG), University of Sadat City (EG), University of Chieti-Pescara (IT), King Salman International University
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals
56.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.