Why Is Fan Verbal Aggression So Fierce: An Evolutionary Psychology Perspective

Fan-verbal aggression conflict is a worldwide universal phenomenon. As opposed to condemning fans as reckless or irrational, our work provides an evolutionary psychology perspective to give a possible explanation of this phenomenon. This paper points out that people in modern society join alliances for shared interests and then face an anti-exploitation mechanism. To preserve the right to gain resources and avoid losing benefits from an alliance, showing verbal aggression in public affirms ones role as a contributor rather than a cheater or free rider. Eventually, when conflict occurs, instead of mediating, getting involved or keeping silent are usually the only choices, leaving the dispute to heat up. We reveal this psychological computation from the theory of welfare tradeoff ratios. The group members WTR to the aggressor will be higher than their WTR to the non-aggressor. Participants in college with experience in idol chasing (N=500) will be involved.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications in Humanities Research
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7064/2024.23328
Primary Topic
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why Is Fan Verbal Aggression So Fierce: An Evolutionary Psychology Perspective

Yuhan Shen, Qingyu Li, Huiya Zhou
Communications in Humanities Research
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
article

Why Is Fan Verbal Aggression So Fierce: An Evolutionary Psychology Perspective

Yuhan Shen, Qingyu Li, Huiya Zhou
article en

Abstract

Fan-verbal aggression conflict is a worldwide universal phenomenon. As opposed to condemning fans as reckless or irrational, our work provides an evolutionary psychology perspective to give a possible explanation of this phenomenon. This paper points out that people in modern society join alliances for shared interests and then face an anti-exploitation mechanism. To preserve the right to gain resources and avoid losing benefits from an alliance, showing verbal aggression in public affirms ones role as a contributor rather than a cheater or free rider. Eventually, when conflict occurs, instead of mediating, getting involved or keeping silent are usually the only choices, leaving the dispute to heat up. We reveal this psychological computation from the theory of welfare tradeoff ratios. The group members WTR to the aggressor will be higher than their WTR to the non-aggressor. Participants in college with experience in idol chasing (N=500) will be involved.

Communications in Humanities ResearchVol. 59(1)
Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Anhui Medical University (CN), Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.