Do designated market makers provide liquidity during downward extreme price movements?
We study the trading activity of designated market makers (DMMs) in electronic markets using a unique dataset with audit-trail information on trader classification. DMMs may either adhere to their market-making agreements and offer immediacy during periods of heavy selling pressure, or they might lean-with-the-wind to profit from private information. We test these competing theories during extreme (downward) price movements, which we detect using a novel methodology. We show that DMMs provide liquidity when the selling pressure is concentrated on a single stock, but consume liquidity (leaving liquidity provision to slower traders) when several stocks are affected. • We study designated market makers liquidity provision in Nyse-Euronext. • We show that they provide liquidity in case of extreme selling pressure concentrated on single stocks. • They instead consume liquidity when selling pressure is systematic. • We use a new identification method for extreme price movements, which crucially allows to assess the above results.
Authors
- Mario Bellia (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1165-9970)
- Loriana Pelizzon (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4489-0167)
- Kim Christensen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7648-7332)
- Aleksey Kolokolov
- Roberto Renò (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1470-2420)
Institutions
- Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
- New Economic School (RU)
- École Supérieure des Sciences Économiques et Commerciales (FR)
- Ca' Foscari University of Venice (IT)
- Aarhus University (DK)
- European Commission (BE)
- Manchester School of Architecture (GB)
- European Centre for Living Technology (IT)
- Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Financial Markets
- Published
- 2025-05-23
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finmar.2025.100988
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 4.42
Funders
- European Commission
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
- Università degli Studi di Verona
- Leibniz-Gemeinschaft