Data Governance and Cross-Border Flow Regulations: A Comparative Study of China’s FTAs and WTO Framework

The exponential rise of the digital economy has amplified the importance of cross-border data flows and data governance as central issues in international trade law. This study critically examines and compares the regulatory frameworks governing data flows under China’s Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) and the World Trade Organization (WTO) framework, particularly through the lens of the Joint Statement Initiative (JSI) on e-commerce. The research investigates how China’s sovereignty-oriented approach to data governance contrasts with the WTO’s liberalization-focused model. Employing a comparative legal methodology, the study analyzes key provisions on data localization, regulatory autonomy, and cross-border data transfer commitments in both regimes. Findings reveal that while the WTO framework advocates minimal barriers to data flows to enhance global trade, China’s FTAs embed broad exceptions based on public policy and national security, reflecting a strategic emphasis on digital sovereignty. The article concludes that this divergence could lead to regulatory fragmentation but also opens space for pluralistic governance models. For developing countries, China’s model offers a pragmatic alternative to reconcile digital trade facilitation with domestic regulatory priorities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
˜The œcritical review of social sciences studies
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59075/v92cgv40
Citations
1
Primary Topic
World Trade Organization Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Data Governance and Cross-Border Flow Regulations: A Comparative Study of China’s FTAs and WTO Framework

Najeeb Ullah Khan, Maseeh Ullah, Muhammad Haris
1 citations
˜The œcritical review of social sciences studies
World Trade Organization Law
8.52
article

Data Governance and Cross-Border Flow Regulations: A Comparative Study of China’s FTAs and WTO Framework

Najeeb Ullah Khan, Maseeh Ullah, Muhammad Haris
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The exponential rise of the digital economy has amplified the importance of cross-border data flows and data governance as central issues in international trade law. This study critically examines and compares the regulatory frameworks governing data flows under China’s Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) and the World Trade Organization (WTO) framework, particularly through the lens of the Joint Statement Initiative (JSI) on e-commerce. The research investigates how China’s sovereignty-oriented approach to data governance contrasts with the WTO’s liberalization-focused model. Employing a comparative legal methodology, the study analyzes key provisions on data localization, regulatory autonomy, and cross-border data transfer commitments in both regimes. Findings reveal that while the WTO framework advocates minimal barriers to data flows to enhance global trade, China’s FTAs embed broad exceptions based on public policy and national security, reflecting a strategic emphasis on digital sovereignty. The article concludes that this divergence could lead to regulatory fragmentation but also opens space for pluralistic governance models. For developing countries, China’s model offers a pragmatic alternative to reconcile digital trade facilitation with domestic regulatory priorities.

˜The œcritical review of social sciences studiesVol. 3(2)
Southwest University of Political Science & Law (CN), Zhongnan University of Economics and Law (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
World Trade Organization Law
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.