Comparison Analysis of IPO of Biotech Companies: Case Study of Innovent Biologics and Genor Biopharma

This study investigates the IPO strategy models of Innovent Biologics and Genor Biopharma, two major Chinese biopharmaceutical companies. The two companies are also involved in the oncology and immune disease drugs and taking the 18A listing system of Hong Kong as capital entry point to support their R&D-centered businesses. Innovent Biologics pursued an independent set of research and development projects, which attracted a wide range of investors and provided a stable post-IPO growth. On the other hand, Genor Biopharma used a hybrid approach and focused on a specific group of investors; however, this caused its stock value to fluctuate. The findings of the study stress the roles of strategic planning, investor diversification, and innovation when it comes to biotech IPOs. The main takeaway is that maintaining an R&D pipeline and having a diversified investor base creates positive sentiment and strengthens the future market perspective, all of which are invaluable tips for considering future biotech companies' listings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Economics Management and Political Sciences
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/2025.23327
Primary Topic
Innovation Policy and R&D
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison Analysis of IPO of Biotech Companies: Case Study of Innovent Biologics and Genor Biopharma

Junkai Li
Advances in Economics Management and Political Sciences
Innovation Policy and R&D
article

Comparison Analysis of IPO of Biotech Companies: Case Study of Innovent Biologics and Genor Biopharma

Junkai Li
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the IPO strategy models of Innovent Biologics and Genor Biopharma, two major Chinese biopharmaceutical companies. The two companies are also involved in the oncology and immune disease drugs and taking the 18A listing system of Hong Kong as capital entry point to support their R&D-centered businesses. Innovent Biologics pursued an independent set of research and development projects, which attracted a wide range of investors and provided a stable post-IPO growth. On the other hand, Genor Biopharma used a hybrid approach and focused on a specific group of investors; however, this caused its stock value to fluctuate. The findings of the study stress the roles of strategic planning, investor diversification, and innovation when it comes to biotech IPOs. The main takeaway is that maintaining an R&D pipeline and having a diversified investor base creates positive sentiment and strengthens the future market perspective, all of which are invaluable tips for considering future biotech companies' listings.

Advances in Economics Management and Political SciencesVol. 180(1)
Adam Smith Institute (GB), University of Glasgow (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Innovation Policy and R&D
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison Analysis of IPO of Biotech Companies: Case Study of Innovent Biologics and Genor Biopharma — Junkai Li · Advances in Economics Management and Political Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS