Regulating Tools for Hacking: Limitations, Challenges and Possibilities

ABSTRACT Tools developed for the purpose of unilaterally exploiting computer systems and their communications will pose a persistent policy and regulatory problem. Regulation of hacking tools to date, however, has been piecemeal, inconsistent and often incoherent. Some of this incoherence is a result of semantic uncertainty about how to define hacking tools with scholarship, commentary, and regulatory efforts using a variety of terminology to refer to a related set of items that have no clear definitional boundaries or technical coherence. This paper attempts to reconcile these semantic issues with the need to take productive regulatory steps by articulating how hacking tools emerge from multiple sources that have different ecologies of production and distribution creating unique regulatory challenges and dynamics. Reflecting on these challenges can inform better governance of hacking capabilities whilst also identifying clear regulatory constraints that will persist over the long‐term.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Policy & Internet
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.70004
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.25

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Regulating Tools for Hacking: Limitations, Challenges and Possibilities

Diarmaid Harkin, Vas Panagiotopoulos
1 citations
Policy & Internet
Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
3.25
article

Regulating Tools for Hacking: Limitations, Challenges and Possibilities

Diarmaid Harkin, Vas Panagiotopoulos
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Tools developed for the purpose of unilaterally exploiting computer systems and their communications will pose a persistent policy and regulatory problem. Regulation of hacking tools to date, however, has been piecemeal, inconsistent and often incoherent. Some of this incoherence is a result of semantic uncertainty about how to define hacking tools with scholarship, commentary, and regulatory efforts using a variety of terminology to refer to a related set of items that have no clear definitional boundaries or technical coherence. This paper attempts to reconcile these semantic issues with the need to take productive regulatory steps by articulating how hacking tools emerge from multiple sources that have different ecologies of production and distribution creating unique regulatory challenges and dynamics. Reflecting on these challenges can inform better governance of hacking capabilities whilst also identifying clear regulatory constraints that will persist over the long‐term.

Policy & InternetVol. 17(2)
Deakin University (AU)
Deakin University
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
3.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Regulating Tools for Hacking: Limitations, Challenges and Possibilities — Diarmaid Harkin, Vas Panagiotopoulos · Policy & Internet (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS