Colonialism, Governance, and Fisheries: Perspectives from Lake Malawi

Abstract This piece explores the parallel development of two fisheries management regimes in mid-twentieth-century Lake Malawi: one imposed by the British colonial government over the lake and the other by Senior Chief Makanjira focused on Mbenji Island. The parallel development of these regimes provides opportunity for close analysis of how fisheries management centred on different knowledge and practices led to distinctive legacies of governance legitimacy and efficacy. Given the increasing recognition that Indigenous knowledge is crucial to the future sustainability of fisheries globally, we contend that it is imperative to recognise the ways in which colonial pasts have embedded knowledge hierarchies and exclusionary decision-making processes within national fisheries governance regimes that continue to obstruct capacities to bring different knowledges, practices, and management approaches together effectively and appropriately.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of African History
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s002185372500012x
Primary Topic
Aquatic Ecosystems and Biodiversity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Colonialism, Governance, and Fisheries: Perspectives from Lake Malawi

Bryson Nkhoma, Tracy Morse, David Wilson, Elias Chirwa et al.
The Journal of African History
Aquatic Ecosystems and Biodiversity
article

Colonialism, Governance, and Fisheries: Perspectives from Lake Malawi

Bryson Nkhoma, Tracy Morse, David Wilson, Elias Chirwa, Charles W. Knapp, Wapulumuka Mulwafu, Milo Gough
article en

Abstract

Abstract This piece explores the parallel development of two fisheries management regimes in mid-twentieth-century Lake Malawi: one imposed by the British colonial government over the lake and the other by Senior Chief Makanjira focused on Mbenji Island. The parallel development of these regimes provides opportunity for close analysis of how fisheries management centred on different knowledge and practices led to distinctive legacies of governance legitimacy and efficacy. Given the increasing recognition that Indigenous knowledge is crucial to the future sustainability of fisheries globally, we contend that it is imperative to recognise the ways in which colonial pasts have embedded knowledge hierarchies and exclusionary decision-making processes within national fisheries governance regimes that continue to obstruct capacities to bring different knowledges, practices, and management approaches together effectively and appropriately.

The Journal of African HistoryVol. 66
Mzuzu University (MW), University of Strathclyde (GB), University of Oxford (GB)
Arts and Humanities Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Aquatic Ecosystems and Biodiversity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Colonialism, Governance, and Fisheries: Perspectives from Lake Malawi — Bryson Nkhoma, Tracy Morse, et al. · The Journal of African History (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS