A Simple Mixed‐Effects Modeling for the Precision of Automated Differential Cell Counters Using R

To register their device, manufacturers of automated differential cell counters (ADCC) are required to demonstrate satisfactory precision that meets regulatory standards such as those in 21 CFR 864.5220 in the United States. Mixed-effects models can be used for the estimation of variance components from a range of factors (operators, days, reagent lots, etc.) to characterize the "within-laboratory" or "across laboratories" analytical error associated with ADCCs for a variety of samples representing a plethora of measurand intervals. However, this task can be daunting and time-consuming due to the increasing complexity of the number of blood-associated parameters reported by those devices and the iterative calculations over numerous factors. In this paper, we propose a simple-to-follow R algorithm that overcomes these challenges and provides a comprehensive and effective estimation of variance components in a regulatory-ready reporting format.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical and Translational Science
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.70254
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Simple Mixed‐Effects Modeling for the Precision of Automated Differential Cell Counters Using R

John Nkrumah Mensah, Karl Stessy Bisselou, Brett G. Hilbers
Clinical and Translational Science
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
article

A Simple Mixed‐Effects Modeling for the Precision of Automated Differential Cell Counters Using R

John Nkrumah Mensah, Karl Stessy Bisselou, Brett G. Hilbers
article en

Abstract

To register their device, manufacturers of automated differential cell counters (ADCC) are required to demonstrate satisfactory precision that meets regulatory standards such as those in 21 CFR 864.5220 in the United States. Mixed-effects models can be used for the estimation of variance components from a range of factors (operators, days, reagent lots, etc.) to characterize the "within-laboratory" or "across laboratories" analytical error associated with ADCCs for a variety of samples representing a plethora of measurand intervals. However, this task can be daunting and time-consuming due to the increasing complexity of the number of blood-associated parameters reported by those devices and the iterative calculations over numerous factors. In this paper, we propose a simple-to-follow R algorithm that overcomes these challenges and provides a comprehensive and effective estimation of variance components in a regulatory-ready reporting format.

Clinical and Translational ScienceVol. 18(5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.