A Biomarker Signature‐Guided Clinical Trial Design for Precision Medicine

Targeted cancer therapies aim to effectively treat patients with specific biomarker profiles. Nevertheless, these therapies may not always precisely hit their intended targets, leading to uncertainty about the specific subset of patients who will benefit. To address this uncertainty, the identification of sensitive patient subsets in clinical trials becomes crucial. Our proposed phase IIB/III clinical trial design seeks to pinpoint a biomarker signature with precision, ensuring the accurate identification of patients who will respond to a specific treatment. This approach allows for the selective enrollment of sensitive patients to maximize benefits for trial participants. We incorporate Bayesian methodology to facilitate response-adaptive randomization, enhancing the likelihood that each participant receives his/her optimal treatment. Furthermore, our design uses inverse-probability-of-treatment-weighted analysis to avoid selection bias and control for the type I error rate. The evaluation of this trial design is based on four criteria: the statistical power, response rate of all patients participating in the current trial, their individual loss, and probabilities of receiving their optimal treatment for both current trial participants and future patients. Simulations demonstrate the proposed design's potential for maximizing trial participants' benefits with little sacrifice on statistical power. Its key advantages include an improved overall response rate within the trial and a higher percentage of patients receiving the optimal treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Statistics in Medicine
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.70103
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Biomarker Signature‐Guided Clinical Trial Design for Precision Medicine

Jing Ning, Han Chen, Xuelin Huang, Dejian Lai et al.
2 citations
Statistics in Medicine
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
5.26
article

A Biomarker Signature‐Guided Clinical Trial Design for Precision Medicine

Jing Ning, Han Chen, Xuelin Huang, Dejian Lai, Ruosha Li, Yuan Li
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Targeted cancer therapies aim to effectively treat patients with specific biomarker profiles. Nevertheless, these therapies may not always precisely hit their intended targets, leading to uncertainty about the specific subset of patients who will benefit. To address this uncertainty, the identification of sensitive patient subsets in clinical trials becomes crucial. Our proposed phase IIB/III clinical trial design seeks to pinpoint a biomarker signature with precision, ensuring the accurate identification of patients who will respond to a specific treatment. This approach allows for the selective enrollment of sensitive patients to maximize benefits for trial participants. We incorporate Bayesian methodology to facilitate response-adaptive randomization, enhancing the likelihood that each participant receives his/her optimal treatment. Furthermore, our design uses inverse-probability-of-treatment-weighted analysis to avoid selection bias and control for the type I error rate. The evaluation of this trial design is based on four criteria: the statistical power, response rate of all patients participating in the current trial, their individual loss, and probabilities of receiving their optimal treatment for both current trial participants and future patients. Simulations demonstrate the proposed design's potential for maximizing trial participants' benefits with little sacrifice on statistical power. Its key advantages include an improved overall response rate within the trial and a higher percentage of patients receiving the optimal treatment.

Statistics in MedicineVol. 44(10-12)
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), Zimmer Biomet (United States) (US), Supernus Pharmaceuticals (United States) (US), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
5.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.